I had no idea of the size and variety of the Fediverse! It has me feeling a bit overwhelmed. I’m enjoying BookWyrm very much; it’s the GoodReads/LibraryThing replacement I’ve been looking for for years.

I love the simplicity of Paper.wf for blogging. It’s truly elegant; I just click the link and start typing. But as far as I can tell there’s no way for others to find my blog or for me to find other blogs on the site. There’s no browse or follow feature. Nor can anyone comment on my posts! Those seem to me to be HUGE omissions.

Have you used any Fediverse blogging options? What are they like? And what other Fediverse services would you recommend? Other than Mastodon, I’ve already tried that (it didn’t excite me).

  • TooLikeTheNope@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fediverse is well differentiated into many sites offering similar capabilities to their more well established commercial and proprietary counterpart, and as the time passes these federated alternatives quality is nearing practically the production level, apart from Mastodon and Lemmy which are the most known by now it is worth mentioning also PeerTube (Youtube), PixelFed (instagram), Misskey, Calckey and Pleroma (a mix between twitter and tumblr), HubZilla (facebook), FunkWhale(Bandcamp) and OwnCast (twitch).

    Here some handy links:

    https://joinfediverse.wiki/Main_Page

    https://www.fediverse.to/

    https://fediverse.party/

  • sussy_gussy@wirebase.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I could be wrong but I think Paper.wf is only intended to write stuff on and you need to promote your blog via other socials. Then, people can follow your blog via things like Lemmy, Mastodon or other Fediverse platforms. Commenting would also be done via other fediverse platforms I imagine.

  • !ozoned@lemmy.world@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use GoToSocial with Sempahore for my microblogging (alternative to Mastodon).

    Also Owncast as an alternative to Twitch.

    And then I watch tilvids.com and other Peertube instances for videos.

    And of course Lemmy. :-D

    Oh and then there’s Funkwhale for audio.

    It’s all in different states of usability, depending on the communities involved.

      • !ozoned@lemmy.world@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Understandable. But it’s the chicken and egg problem. Creators don’t want to create content, because there’s no consumers. Consumers don’t want to sign up, because there’s no creators.

        So are you the chicken or the egg? :-D

        If you’re on one you don’t like anymore you could always change instances and watch videos there. If you’re worried about losing comments, well you can comment from other Fediverse servers such as Mastodon or GoToSocial and they show up on the page for the video. :-)

        • sabret00the@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You know what, Peertube needs the equivalent of an acquisition and the perfect candidates would be, and I’m on record saying this before, DailyMotion and Vimeo. They’ve already got content and by implementing activitiypub integration, they can grow their audiences and compete with YouTube for once and for all.

          But yeah, for me. I haven’t even found a video to watch let alone comment. That said, my YouTube is generally me watching album reactions, music videos, Hot Ones, Adam Something and Beard Meats Food.

          • !ozoned@lemmy.world@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nothing stopping Vimeo from plumbing in ActivityPun amd joining the Fediverse. It’s open and the only reason no one does is because the data is valuable and they don’t want to share and play nice.

            These walled gardens were not how the internet was imagined.

  • Hexorg@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just a side note, ActivityPub protocol - the core engine that lets all of fediverse to talk to the rest of the fediverse is… 5 years old. Every feature imaginable is still to be implemented.

  • HalJor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is/will there be a movie/TV equivalent of BookWyrm, something to track and discuss what you’ve been watching? A quick search tells me it’s been discussed and seems like something people want but it doesn’t look like it’s been done yet, at least not as a dedicated service. Is that right?

    • albert180@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      AFAIK the problem is there is no good movie database which allows free use of their data

      • BobQuasit@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So what? We’ll create one!

        Years ago the owners of GoodReads announced that Amazon had taken away their access to the Amazon book database. It was an existential threat, they said, and asked the GoodReads community to volunteer to create a new book database to replace Amazon’s. Hundreds or thousands of us worked for free, donating thousands or tens of thousands of hours to the project.

        And then GoodReads announced that they’d sold out to Amazon. Apparently they’d been in negotiations with those bastards the whole time they were lying to us about losing access to the database. Maybe proving that they could sucker their loyal users into donating free labor helped raise the selling price of GoodReads a little.

        As for the database we created, I guess it’s Amazon’s now. Of course, if we create a movie database of our own, NOBODY will be able to buy it! And we can make it available for free use, if we want.