I may be a touch biased, but I feel like you might enjoy trying Gentoo one day, especially with the recent official binary package host.
I may be a touch biased, but I feel like you might enjoy trying Gentoo one day, especially with the recent official binary package host.
there is no good answer
There is clearly a worst option.
I use Traefik for all of my containerised services. It’s fantastic.
I’m sorry, but no. PluralKit only really impacts a tiny minority of the userbase to begin with. It isn’t enough to cause people outside that group to choose the platform, nor is it enough for people outside of that minority to avoid moving to whatever the next big thing is.
You can never trust it for long term archival / to stay intact for a long period though.
That’s the point.
IRC is fine, so are mailing lists; I use both, plus various git forges, to contribute to open source projects.
IRC is still going strong on OFTC and Libera.chat
I get that the younger folks like discord, but seriously it’s a proprietary mess that locks everything behind a wall and tries to extract payment from each and every user.
It may or may not work, unfortunately.
I successfully ran 2x32GB in a Dell XPS 15 that “didn’t support” it, because the larger DIMMs didn’t exist at the time it was designed and documentation was done up.
It’s not going to hurt to try, but if you have two DIMM slots it’s worth a shot; the slots are already wired up to address lines! Maybe try with one first?
Edit: the CPU specs say that it supports 64GB and only up to two memory channels. It’s looking pretty good on that end.
BareOS is a great open source option. The GUI is a webUI but you also have a powerful console on the shell if you need to script.
I have a multi-WAN configuration on my router, with ipv6 VDSL then ipv4 VDSL then a prepaid 4G modem as the backup link. I rarely fail over but it’s been fantastic watching traffic stats when it does.
My only downside is the CGNAT on that connection that prevents things like a backup VPN gateway…
Simply refuting the BS claim that it’s impossible for there to be a Linux virus.
This one existed, therefore the claim is false.
There are still no viruses for Linux … because it’s not possible.
Here is just one example that proves your assertion wrong.
for everyday use … hektograms and the like are more common
[citation needed]
I wrote some TypeScript modules to process a bunch of documentation in markdown to a ton of output formats via pandoc + latex.
No real reason for it, except that I was able to start with the export module of a node-based thing written in JavaScript and iterate from there until I had a working system in CI/CD.
Oh hey.
I’ve done this in a ton of different ways.
Manually, viis GitLab CI/CD, CI/CD with Kaniko.
My current favourite though is Kubler; I did a write-up for Lemmy a little while ago: https://lemmy.srcfiles.zip/post/32334
It’s fine with Let’sEncrypt via the DNS01 challenge; my lab typically only uses one wildcard certificate for all the services there unless I have a specific need to generate an indovidual cert for a service.
At the end of the day Traefik isn’t that hard, especially if you know the core concepts; if you know both and have a need for Traefik I’d just use that everywhere.
Here’s the secret to stuff like this:
Run a single reverse proxy / edge router for all of your containerised services.
I recommend Traefik - https://gitlab.com/Matt.Jolly/traefik-grafana-prometheus-docker
You can configure services with labels attached to the container and (almost) never expose ports directly. It also lets you host an arbitrary number of services listening on 80/443.
An example config might look like this:
# docker-compose.yml
version: '3.9'
services:
bitwarden:
image: vaultwarden/server:latest
restart: always
volumes:
- /data/vaultwarden/:/data
environment:
# - ADMIN_TOKEN=
- WEBSOCKET_ENABLED=true
networks:
- proxy
labels:
- traefik.enable=true
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-https.tls.certresolver=letsencrypt
- traefik.http.middlewares.redirect-https.redirectScheme.scheme=https
- traefik.http.middlewares.redirect-https.redirectScheme.permanent=true
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-https.rule=Host(`my.domain.com`)
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-https.entrypoints=websecure
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-https.tls=true
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-https.service=bitwarden-ui
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-http.rule=Host(`my.domain.com`)
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-http.entrypoints=web
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-http.middlewares=redirect-https
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-ui-http.service=bitwarden-ui
- traefik.http.services.bitwarden-ui.loadbalancer.server.port=80
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-https.rule=Host(`my.domain.com) && Path(`/notifications/hub`)
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-https.entrypoints=websecure
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-https.tls=true
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-https.service=bitwarden-websocket
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-http.rule=Host(`my.domain.com`) && Path(`/notifications/hub`)
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-http.entrypoints=web
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-http.middlewares=redirect-https
- traefik.http.routers.bitwarden-websocket-http.service=bitwarden-websocket
- traefik.http.services.bitwarden-websocket.loadbalancer.server.port=3012
Yeah they’ve only rolled out a version of curl that broke the package manager a few times.