• cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Once you go 5k (at 27”) you can never go back.

    I ised to deride them for their rediculous cost and mashup of parts, then I used one at an office I consulted at and a month later I bought myself one…

    I’m glad someone else is pushing pixel density and giving Apple competition.

    I don’t want 4k27” 300fps OLED or microLED. I just want 5k OLED now.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, I am always disappointed 5K didn’t properly supplant 1440p in the monitor market. 4K at 27" is workable but the scaling can never be as good as 5K would be.

    • irdc@derp.foo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I concur. I have one since they’re available. Nothing compares other than my phone display really. Though the refresh rate could be a little higher (and thus the latency a little lower).

      • cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, Promotion and HDR are the biggest things missing, though neither really impact my work so I’m fine with it.