While Jitsi is open-source, most people use the platform they provide, meet.jit.si, for immediate conference calls. They have now introduced a “Know Your Customer” policy and require at least one of the attendees to log in with a Facebook, Github (Microsoft), or Google account.

One option to avoid this is to self-host, but then you’ll be identifiable via your domain and have to maintain a server.

As a true alternative to Jitsi, there’s jami.net. It is a decentralized conference app, free open-source, and account creation is optional. It’s available for all major platforms (Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android), including on F-Droid.

  • esaru@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Jitsi remains free. As you can see, this isn’t about money but rather about privacy, which has diminished compared to before.

    The issue with centralized systems becomes more apparent: the provders are held accountable for their users’ actions.

    • Peter Bronez@hachyderm.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      @esaru @bmaxv @technology concur that this reduces privacy for users of Jitsi’s hosted service. It also has some concrete benefits for Jitsi - they get to outsource account validation and security. Perhaps they were struggling to contain abuse.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Privacy has not diminished, you can host your own instance of the jitsi software account-free and take on the liability of people using your server for child porn yourself if you want to.