A superficially modest blog post from a senior Hatter announces that going forward, the company will only publish the source code of its CentOS Stream product to the world. In other words, only paying customers will be able to obtain the source code to Red Hat Enterprise Linux… And under the terms of their contracts with the Hat, that means that they can’t publish it.

  • carlyman@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with the sentiment…but hard not to say this isn’t a clickbait title. Let’s not rely on rhetoric…let’s speak with data, details, and specifics to help foster actual discourse and constructive disagreement.

      • carlyman@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I prefer to avoid clickbait titles and discussions around soundbites. If you prefer clickbait titles and rhetoric, so be it. I was hoping for something different.

    • aranym@lemmy.nameOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      When most people think of clickbait, there is a disconnect between the content presented and the title. There is no such disconnect in this case. Your interpretation of the word is an outlier, and even if I agreed that it was clickbait, you still haven’t convinced me it is a bad thing in this specific scenario.

      • carlyman@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is generally some truth to clickbait titles…and the more you agree with it, the less clickbait-y it seems. “Crushing blow” is unnecessary rhetoric in my view (and I’d bet 50 cents AI wrote it).

        I’m actually not arguing the intent of the article…rather just how I hope this community raises the bar in discourse.

        • aranym@lemmy.nameOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          We clearly have a disconnect here. There’s a reason I always put a quote to act as summary in the description of my article posts, they provide more detail than the title could. At the end of the day, I think providing the original title regardless of its perceived quality is the better option when these posts are glorified links anyways. (I assure you it was not from AI, The Register has pretty high journalistic standards.)

          • mack123@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            As a very long time reader of The Register, I actually enjoy their headlines. They have always had a tabloid style to them. Even before clickbait was a thing and I have seldom been disappointed at the contents of anything I have clicked on. So agreed, a quality site.

            Arstechnica and The Register are my tow oldest daily reads.