• fluke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    If my airforce was comprised in bulk of early to mid era cold war museum pieces with a (very) small handful of late cold war era jets as my flagship units then I would be impressed with anything developed after 1991 as well.

    I mean, that’s fair enough in itself. There’s plenty of nations out there still rocking their Falcons, Flankers, Frogfoots, Frogger, Tornados, Mirages etc etc completely respectedly. But they also allow their pilots more stick time in half a year than the vast majority of NK’s pilots get in half a decade.

    • DBT@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I watched an F22 Raptor practice for an air show recently and it was pretty mind blowing to see. The maneuverability of that thing is insane. And they don’t even show its full potential at air shows.

      • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s crazy to me is that we haven’t seen USAF stealth technology in combat since the F-117s in Serbia. Those things were basically undetectable without their weapons bay open and they were only 1st gen designs, plus I bet radar tech hasn’t nearly kept pace with stealth since then.

        Sometimes I want NATO to intervene in the skies over Ukraine just so I could see the f-35 and f-22 in real combat scenarios. But then I remember that war sucks and think maybe not.

        • jasory@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          F-22 and F-35 were both deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq. The F-117 wasn’t a fighter and never engaged in air-to-air combat (because it couldn’t, it was subsonic had poor maneuverability and no active radar) so the F-22 and F-35 both meet the same standard that you are using for “combat” with the F-117.

          • shinyLane@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            F-117 did have radar, it also could carry AIM-9 Sidewinders internally. They trained pilots of 117s to take out AWAC planes… I flew with pilots who trained as such.

            Just more bullshit from the internet “know it all.”

            I dOnT nEeD SoUrCeS bEcAusE tHiS iS aLl TrIvIaL.

            You look like a hipster asshat.

            • jasory@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you’re going to try to harass me, you should make sure you aren’t botching your comments. You edited your comment so now it looks like you are criticizing your original comment, not anything I said.

  • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s weird that entire governments come across like thinly veiled boomers posting on Facebook to trigger and dunk their friends.

    It actually feels like it’s the same ball park now.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Guy with mostly 1950 technology in 2020something is highly impressed by country with mostly 1990 technology

    Yeah, I would be too

  • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah I remember their fighter jets flying into Ukraine with a TomTok GPS somebody dropped off at a Salvation Army store in New Jersey before some Igor bought it and FedEx’d it back to Siberia. So impressive.