• ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    The headline makes it sound like they bravely sold the drugs themselves and outcompeted the gangs on their turf… And then you read it and that’s exactly what they did, a sensational but accurate headline, someone got a boner from writing that for sure. Reducing deaths from bad drugs is a noble goal but it’s a really tricky area and rife for abuse so I hope they can stay on the “straight and narrow” even if they did take a bit of a novel route.

  • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whats the difference between gangs profiting off selling cocaine and heroin and someone else doing it? Is this not just swapping one gang with another that claims to have better morals?

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the difference between having regulated businesses selling addictive drugs via controlled markets and having violent criminal gangs selling the drugs in unregulated markets. The former tends to be less damaging to society as a whole, while still not being great for the individual. Look at alcohol prohibition in the US in the 1920’s. It was a social disaster. Criminal gangs quickly popped up to fill the demand and organized crime became entrenched in a number of areas. When prohibition ended, alcohol went back to a fairly mundane product which is sold by fairly normal companies which don’t regularly engage in mass murder to control a market. Sure, calling Budweiser “beer” might be skirting truth in advertising laws; but, AB InBev isn’t lining it’s competitors up against a a wall and shooting them.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, considering they have unofficial blessing from the police, it can bring not only more competition to the market, but competition consisting of people who are more aware of the consequences of their actions. Both will make the product better and cleaner.

      The criminalization (and proper enforcement) of certain services ensures that only people with high risk tolerance, or ones who can’t properly realize the consequences of their actions will provide them. In other words, if the only people in drug business are the ones who don’t give a shit, they won’t give a shit about their customers. Even if it means killing them faster.

  • itsdavetho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    ?? This is great but criminals are still profiting because the drugs are bought from the darknet , which come from… criminals

    Still a good thing tho

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      By definition, any group selling illegal drugs is committing crimes.

      However, street gangs do other things besides sell illegal drugs; they often engage in violence in their communities.

      In addition, these folks are selling pure lab-tested drugs, rather than mixing them with other substances (“cutting”, often with harmful substances) or selling one drug as another (e.g. methamphetamine sold as MDMA), which are common in the street drug trade.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Offering a brick of pure cocaine, and delivering a brick of pure cocaine is criminal, but morally non problematic.

      Offering a dose of cocaine, and delivering half cocaine, half stuff you’ve dug out of the bottom of your old lunch box, is equally criminal, but also a dangerous scam.