• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not excited for the zima project, but I did love the enthusiasm, and the Lego future he painted with his words.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is FUD. If you run a redundant filesystem like btrfs or ZFS that does checksumming (which you should anyway in a NAS), then ECC memory is only a nice-to-have and not vital.

  • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t quite get the point of these things. Yes, super tiny, but what’s the point, if every expansion requires a yanky case contraption?

    Who exactly is this for?

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s relatively cheap and not many boards like that come with a x86 chip (which makes tinkering a lot easier) and a PCIe expansion slot. How it looks doesn’t really matter if you have in somewhere hidden in a cupboard, like most home-server are.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But is it really that cheap for its performance? And lack of upgradeability?

        I’d argue, most people would fare better with a regular thin client.