• Steeve@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    China is the number one greenhouse gas contributor, Russia is near the top of the list as well. Fuck off tankies.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you think those 2 are communist countries, you’re stuck in the last century. Let me give you some news. The Soviet Union collapsed and gave way to a capitalist oligarchy. China realized that capitalism is profitable and brings them tons of money from the west. I have no idea why tankies still simp those countries as communist (wait, I do actually - because tankies never had any principles of their own, they just wanted to be anti-west).

      There is one country that needs to kickstart change for it to have any effect, it’s the US. Not only does it pollute the most per capita, it’s a huge market. My tiny ass country with fuel prices already being twice as much in the US, can raise fuel prices even more, but that won’t affect global demand. Americans no longer getting fuel for essentially free, would actually affect global demand.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, of course, because political systems are binary and there’s only capitalism and communism lmao

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s plenty of systems that mix both, but Russia and China aren’t actually good examples. They’re pretty capitalist.

          If you want a better example of mixing capitalism with socialism, you can take a look at something like the Nordic countries, where there are tons of social services and safety nets, but there’s still a very strong (just regulated) free market.

          • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s plenty of systems that mix both, but Russia and China aren’t actually good examples. They’re pretty capitalist.

            State companies and state-connected companies own more than half of each one’s economy. More than in Nordic countries.

            • agarorn@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you belive that in a communist country everything is owned by the state? If so, I urge you to look up communism again.

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because capitalism with state protection is not capitalism I guess.

              In each, we’re talking about capitalism with the caveat that the owners of the country want a kickback too, and in return local capitalists are protected from foreign capitalists. Vladimir Putin owns Russia, the CCP owns China. In neither case does capital belong to “the people” as a whole.

              • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, it’s not. I mean, for Marxists it is, because Marx describes something similar specifically to XIX century Germany with state-supported enormous trusts, influential aristocracy, and so on. Which is for obvious reason of living there, just not very relevant, because real economists use the term differently.

                In neither case does capital belong to “the people” as a whole.

                Well, CCP is not different from CPSU in this case.

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Seems a bit silly to decide that “capitalism” is the majority contributor to climate change when the country that produces the most greenhouse gases is only “pretty capitalist” doesn’t it? If capitalism is the major contributor, why don’t more capitalist country produce more greenhouse gases?

            I never set out to argue that capitalism doesn’t exist in countries that aren’t primarily capitalist.

            • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Seems a bit silly to decide that “capitalism” is the majority contributor to climate change when the country that produces the most greenhouse gases is only “pretty capitalist” doesn’t it? If capitalism is the major contributor, why don’t more capitalist country produce more greenhouse gases?

              That’s not necessarily the case. The pollution comes from where manufacturing is, not necessarily where consumption is. The demand is coming from capitalist countries.

              Edit: To account for this, we can look at per-capita consumption-based emissions (thanks to @boonhet@lemm.ee for the data link).

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The country that produces the most greenhouse gases is doing so to satisfy the demands of private industry that’s producing goods for private profit. What part of that is not capitalism?

              Also the country that produces the most per capita, is arguably the most capitalist country, the USA.

              • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                While I agree that per capita emissions is a useful metric, perhaps even more useful than raw emissions numbers, where are you getting that the USA has the highest production per capita?

                This table shows data from 2018 so things change, but the per capita emissions would have had to double in five years to put the USA on top.

                If you look at the non-per capita numbers, the USA is the second largest emitter behind China (using data from 2018).

                • boonhet@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Good point, I was a bit inaccurate with my last comment.

                  If you look at the non-per capita consumption based emissions and divide that by the amount of people, you’ll find that Americans consume way more per capita.

                  China has the bigger (even per capita) number in terms of production, but they export a lot of what they produce, whereas Americans get all their shit from China and can then claim China has the worse emissions.

                  Here’s a map showing consumption-based emissions per capita, you can see that the US has a number twice as big as China’s.

    • masquenox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      China is the number one

      Sooo… a capitalist state?

      Russia is near the top

      Sooo… another capitalist state?

      Fuck off tankies.

      You don’t know what a tankie is, do you?

      I knew it was a bad day when we allowed liberals access to that word.

        • masquenox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You walked blindly into this argument with absolutely zero understanding of the subject matter at hand, didn’t you?

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Users are attributing climate change to “capitalism” with no evidence or reasoning to back it up. You’ve made assertions that countries that political experts don’t consider primarily capitalist countries are actually capitalist countries with no evidence to back them up. I don’t have to waste my time disproving your flaky nonsense, calling it out is good enough for me.

            And what part of this conversation makes you feel like the intelligent subject matter expert here? The part where you said liberals shouldn’t use certain words? Keep it up bud, appreciate you helping me decide which communities to filter out here.

            • masquenox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Users are attributing climate change to “capitalism”

              Lol! It’s aliens, right? Climate change is caused by aliens? Is that your angle here?

              I don’t have to waste my time

              I agree… you don’t have to flail blindly and ignorantly because you don’t have a clue what you are talking about. You can get a clue any time you feel like.

              • Steeve@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes of course, the only two super specific variables that exist, capitalism and aliens.

                Would you waste your time talking to you?

                • masquenox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Your claims are so ridiculous I wouldn’t be surprised if you were to start whining about aliens or the earth being flat.

                  Like I said… you don’t have to flail blindly and ignorantly. You can come back to reality any time you feel like.

            • albigu@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Users are attributing climate change to “capitalism” with no evidence or reasoning to back it up.

              Have one (very liberal capitalist) brief source presenting some evidence to how capitalism is to blame. Then have a very short summary write-up on how China has been the world leader in combating climate change. Happy?

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you think a tankie would say China is a capitalist nation? Liberalism really is worse than brain cancer. They are either an anarchist or some other shit, you just see the names of the enemies of the empire and scream, you poor ignorant Gringo.

            • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Kbin needs a way to collapse comment chains bc I’m trying to get past this bullshit and back to where the adults are talking

    • FluffyPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those 2 are literally capitalist countries. Also tankies are the ones who commonly say China is not capitalist.

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            What makes me think that two countries that have never identified as capitalist and have never been identified as capitalist anywhere except for this crazy ass community where you just go ahead and label anything you don’t like simply as “capitalism”? Oh I don’t know, just a hunch I guess!

            • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well if you think ‘because they say so’ is reason enough there’s not really any further to go here I don’t think. I was hoping you’d have a more interesting answer about how the economy is structured or how resources are distributed. It looks more like an authoritarian flavour of capitalism to me but I’m no politics expert so I only have a layman’s view, more than happy to be corrected.

              • Steeve@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Dude, the reason you think they’re capitalist is because someone on Lemmy said so, I’m not going to put effort into correcting something that didn’t have evidence behind it to begin with. I’m not going to sit here and try to prove a negative to correct your layman’s view, that’s not how conversation works.

                • mr_pichon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They have private companies and a market economy, how is that a communist economy exactly ?

                  If your only argument for saying they’re communist is because they said so, then you must also believe that north korea is a democracy right ?

                  • HeavenAndHell@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’re correct. China, I believe I heard, also has more billionaires per capita than the US. Don’t quote me on that, I’m not entirely sure.

            • masquenox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What makes me think that two countries that have never identified as capitalist

              The DPRK “identifies” as “democratic” - so by your logic you should just swallow that hook, line and sinker, too, eh?

              have never been identified as capitalist anywhere except

              Oh, boy… are you in for a surprise - Lenin himself dubbed the fledgling USSR as “state capitalist”.

              Nothing new about it, Clyde.

              Every one of your arguments have been blown out of the water with next-to zero effort… and yet you still pretend you’re in the game.

    • albigu@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The United States has double China’s emissions per capita, and China actually is the world leader in the production of sustainable development products like solar panels even though the USA had a 150 year head start in its industrialisation. Despite whatever criticisms you may have against China, looking only at total emissions is definitely misleading. China’s renewable power has gone up fivefold in the past 15 years in absolute numbers and double in percentage of total production. The USA hasn’t even been building hydro dams since the 80s, while China has built some 15 in the past 20 years. Since one is explicitly the most capitalist country and the other is “”“capitalist actually”“”, I think it is fair to say that capitalism has a negative correlation with fighting climate change.

      Though I have no idea why you included the Russian Federation there, since it is a capitalist oligarchy created by and modelled after the USA. Do you believe that Russia is communist by any chance?