Performance of all-solid-state device developed by Chinese researchers akin to that of advanced varieties, findings published in Nature Communications say.
I mean you really do not have to know anything about this technology or even physics at all to understand that they’re working on completely different parts of that technology. How can anyone have reading comprehension skills that bad and still need to die on their little hill?
Nobody said the Chinese are copying everything, but goodie for you for making up an argument that no one is making.
You should read your own articles after you use Google - the largest problem with your inaccurately titled and researched article is that the conclusions of that single, uncorroborated and unconditional headline (it wasn’t really a study) is based purely on the number of articles published, not on any actual technology or world content. China is by far the largest publisher of pseudoscientific articles, and there is no regulation on the validity of the data presented in those articles. Chinese researchers admit to pushing out their articles at the expense of quality, and the people tasked with identifying the false data within those scientific articles are overwhelmed by the amount of false articles. The Chinese scientific community turns out. You can read about that here:
Removed by mod
Sure, the chinese are just copying everything, they don’t research and develop new technologies. Mhm. Your 1980s racism needs an update.
https://theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/02/china-leading-us-in-technology-race-in-all-but-a-few-fields-thinktank-finds
Or they read the same thing from Japan a few months ago.
Really, different countries are doing research on solid-state batteries, who’da thunk.
What does that have to do with China allegedly being an „appropriation committee“?
Those two reports have literally nothing in common except the words „breakthrough“ and „solid-state batteries“, lol.
You absolutely don’t understand anything at all, so please just stop talking. Thank you.
Yeah beyond being about breakthroughs specifically about solid electrolytes, nothing in common. lol
good grief… 🤦♀️
I mean you really do not have to know anything about this technology or even physics at all to understand that they’re working on completely different parts of that technology. How can anyone have reading comprehension skills that bad and still need to die on their little hill?
So is my potato battery a solid electrolyte
Nobody said the Chinese are copying everything, but goodie for you for making up an argument that no one is making.
You should read your own articles after you use Google - the largest problem with your inaccurately titled and researched article is that the conclusions of that single, uncorroborated and unconditional headline (it wasn’t really a study) is based purely on the number of articles published, not on any actual technology or world content. China is by far the largest publisher of pseudoscientific articles, and there is no regulation on the validity of the data presented in those articles. Chinese researchers admit to pushing out their articles at the expense of quality, and the people tasked with identifying the false data within those scientific articles are overwhelmed by the amount of false articles. The Chinese scientific community turns out. You can read about that here:
https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/chinas-fake-science-industry-how-paper-mills-threaten-progress/
They publish false articles using duplicate and fudged data. That’s not racist, that’s academically and scientifically damaging and Irresponsible.
🥱