• assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Russians truly do not give a shit about anything besides the ego of supreme leader.

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would they agree to a grain deal who mostly goes to europe when they are not in good relationship? Simply because fuck yes european overlords take the grain

          • Version@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            47% goes to Europe, so 53% goes to other countries. So I am technically correct here. African countries will unfortunately feel the biggest impact, even though the numbers maybe aren’t that high.

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          No it doesn’t it goes mostly to China, and China will be okay without this, then, after this, it goes mainly to Europe. Don’t come with this bullshit you give two fucks about African people now.

          • ElegantBiscuit@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The amount of grain still going to Africa is very significant, not to mention whatever processing then export of secondary products eventually goes to developing countries. And grain is a global commodity. Without the grain deal, Ukraine doesn’t have any other viable option to export at volume that can compete with sea exports, given that the European rail gauges are different and the physical logistics of transporting it are cost prohibitive and limited by capacity. That raises the price of Ukrainian grain which raises the price of grain globally since it all competes in the same global market. And those who would be most affected are countries who are both food importers and poor, where Africa and the Middle East are top of the list.

            Rising grain prices sparked the Arab spring, were part contributor to the political and economic collapse of Sri Lanka, and in general higher food prices have a very disproportionate effect on the poor everywhere.

            • athos77@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Costa Rica (stick with me here) is world-renowned for it’s coffee, which makes up 15% of the GDP of the entire country. And years ago, when I visited a coffee plantation in Costa Rica, they told me how they make decaffeinated coffee - and that, while decaffeinated coffee was a product in demand in Costa Rica, there wasn’t a single de-cacfeinating plant in the entire country. It was cheaper for them to ship the coffee to Germany to be decaffeinated, then shipped back to Costa Rica for more processing before being sold. Why is this relevant?

              not to mention whatever processing then export of secondary products eventually goes to developing countries.

              Because it’s entirely possible that they’re processing the base grain into more refined products before it heads to it’s final destination.

              • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because it’s entirely possible that they’re processing the base grain into more refined products before it heads to it’s final destination.

                And, as with any speculation, just because something is possible does not guarantee it is happening. As with any speculation, it helps to try to back up your claims.

          • Version@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It‘s just that Russia presents itself as the savior of the African continent while their actions speak very differently.

      • EnderWi99in@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most of it goes to Africa though. All Russia is doing here is hurting Africa, which is on brand considering Wagner’s dealings there anyway.

      • anteaters@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        lol people are making complete fools of themselves parroting this shit. Of course most of the grain goes to Turkey to travel further from there. Instead of sending ships to fucking Kenya from Ukraine it is much more sensible to get as much as you can out of Ukraine to the next safe harbour - which is Turkey. Apparently these basics are too clever for you lot.

          • anteaters@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah goold old “show me proof” that you won’t accept anyways. Here’s a question for you: if all the grain vanished into Europe as you say, why have there been no complaints from Africa? Where are the famines that were to happen if Ukraine did not surrender so that Russia allows exports again?

            The only complaints from Africa we hear is that Russia’s exit from the deal is a stab in the back. Never did we hear “well the grain never reached Africa anyways” before but now we hear it from the usual useful idiots.

  • vegai@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They are … threatening the UN? This is beyond comic book -evil.

  • lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dealing with the Kremlin is like dealing with teenagers. They threw a tantrum because their bridge got attacked now they’re pretending pulling out of the deal was because of something else.