(Becky Robertson / blogTO)

  • Dearche@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    But the thing I don’t get is that while office space is good revenue, retail is far better. And investing in mix-use buildings is quite a perfect way to get exactly that while reducing the issues with housing. You don’t need to worry about “living where you work” if people naturally want to live in Toronto due to being close to everything you want. Toronto is only one of three cities that is easy to live in without a car, even more so if you want 95% of everything you want within walking distance.

    The turnaround, and hence tax revenue, of retail and entertainment so close to such dense housing boarders on the obscene, whereas suburbs tends to lean towards actually costing tax dollars rather than being a revenue source for the governments. Hell, the numbers are easy to collate, so the leaders are obviously just ignoring real data and instead just doing whatever they want and only paying lip service.

    Who cares about tech oriented office space when 80% of that can be done from home, and you can just make those workers want to live in Toronto due to the amenities rather than transit to work.

      • Dearche@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That presumes that mayors have any actual power to change anything. Maybe if she can convince the council to raise property tax all-round, then there’ll be leeway to actually make the changes needed, but I won’t hold my breath for a miracle. Not when the only mayors we have that managed to make a difference in the last decade have all made ones that made the city demonstrably worse.