• GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m not a fan of the telemetry being enabled by default but having the option to completely disable it makes it not that bad. Though Mozilla definitely doesn’t need search history data (unless the law enforcements told them to collect it) so this change is kinda sus

        • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Mozilla Foundation has a wholly owned subsidiary that is Mozilla Corporation that is for-profit.

          For instance the revenue from Google so they’re the default search engine is seen by Mozilla Corporation. So things search-related will indeed be part of their for-profit arm.

          • Vincent@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s technically for profit, but it has a single shareholder: the Foundation. There are no greedy shareholders that can get rich off of that profit.

            Of course, employees/board members can be richly compensated, but that’s independent of for-/non-profit status.

            • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s not a loophole. As a subsidiary, profits are still invested into the nonprofit and they’re still guided by the Mozilla manifesto. It just lets them do more and raise more funds which would be difficult to do with nonprofit status (selling default search engine for instance). Here’s their original press release when they incorporated Mozilla Corporation in 2005.

        • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          A non-profit can, in fact, profit, but it has specific rules on what it can do with those profits. Tax law is a rabbit hole and I don’t even wanna peer in

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      From what I read in their blog post, nobody is keeping your search history data. It only tracks how often people in general search for things in specific categories, so nobody will be able to learn anything about you specifically from that data.

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Then what’s the point in collecting such data? It won’t help to fix bugs, add new features or even make useful statistics to show publicly. Only personalized ads is what comes to mind. Yes it seems to be anonymized well enough but still ad companies love such data. Maybe Mozilla wants to implement a custom ads functionality that uses this data or they just want to sell it idk. Still changes in this direction are kinda sus

        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I believe there was an experiment making weather data more accessible through the URL bar, e.g. when people start searching for weather there, which could be useful. Presumably, telemetry like this can help determine which of such features to prioritise.

          I could indeed also imagine ads, but then not based on keeping a file on you with all your interests and sharing that with advertisers, but by locally choosing between a couple of categories of ads and showing the ones that are related to your current search, without anyone having to know what you’re actually searching for.