• Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Except even if they had regulations it would not have changed anything since she is a ciswoman

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      Imagine a corrupt state really wants gold. Why wouldn’t they register a whole batch of males as female (or duplicate register as both sexes) wait 20 years then clean up the women’s events?

      • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        so, the heart of your argument itself is sexist. Your argument is, basically, that a man is better than a woman at sports, just because he’s a man. Athletes at this level are insanely talented and fit. Some are even genetic anomalies, which explain why they can be so good at their sport. Simone biles is really small, which is why she’s so good at flipping.

        A female boxer at this level would decimate a male boxer who isn’t genetically selected for and who hasn’t trained his whole life to get to that level. Being male doesn’t make one good at sports.

        On the scale youre talking about, the government would be complicit in widescale corruption to rig a single event in an event where there’s no money involved for the winner, requiring several hundred people to be the athletes who might be good enough to go to the event, boatloads of money to train them, and even then, they might get one through the event if the athlete isn’t injured. All for what reward? A single relatively worthless gold medal?

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Your argument is, basically, that a man is better than a woman at sports, just because he’s a man.

          No. Women should always have the option to compete against men, (and prove they are better), if they chose to. But just look at world records if you need concrete proof that males have an advantage.

          Many sports there is no physical advantage and some (e.g. climbing) women have the advantage.

          On the scale youre talking about, the government would be complicit in widescale corruption to rig a single event in an event where there’s no money involved for the winner,

          Not a single event, this could be done for multiple events, even without the athlete’s knowledge. For the first decade only a few record keepers need to be in the conspiracy.

          All for what reward? A single relatively worthless gold medal?

          Why? You should ask cold war Russia.

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              The person you are responding seems uninformed on the topic of Imane and in spreading misinform.

              However, Russia does have a sordid history messing with international sports. Look up all the scandals in figure skating and also last year Olympics. I’m not sure why they do it. I think it has to do with projecting power on the world stage.

                • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  No you aren’t. You’re arguing about trans women athletes competing in the Olympics against cis women in a thread specifically about Imane.

                  • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I’m arguing about the classification rules of the Olympic committee because the current rules are not sufficiently clear and have caused needless distress to at least two gold medal winners.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago
              • Propaganda and ideological superiority of communism.

              • Cold war rivalry. Proxy battle.

              • National pride and unity.

              • International prestige.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                So nothing important then.

                Yes, you’ve definitely come up with a plausible reason why a Muslim country would be okay with a transgender athlete. Algeria is just desperate for international prestige. It will definitely do something or other.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yes, you’ve definitely come up with a plausible reason why a Muslim country would be okay with a transgender athlete.

                  Have I? Strange. I wasn’t asked that question.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I love how your whole conversation here is like “I’m not saying Khelif isn’t a woman and shouldn’t compete, but someone who is a person who boxes women that I have not named, but have decided is not a woman, should not compete with women. But I’m not saying it’s Khelif.”

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        What do you think they would achieve in any practical way by winning a bunch of gold medals?

        It’s the Olympics, not trade negotiations.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        What the the absolute fuck are you talking about? This is some deranged paranoid nonsense.

    • Irrational_exuberance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      We should expect Rules and regulations regarding a cis woman. The Olympic committee should either allow them as is or lay out specific rules. Decisions cannot be adhoc.

      • Veneroso@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        5 months ago

        You realize that she’s a cis woman, right? Right?

        Or did you take the word from people on YouTube who talk about everything in a certain way?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s so fucking ridiculous to me that people are suggesting fucking Algeria has a trans athlete. Where next, Saudi Arabia?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        They have a specific rule: if your birth certificate and passport say you’re a woman, you get to compete as one.

        What rule do you think they should be using?