• misguidedfunk@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wager they don’t have a recovery vessel because they have people sign contracts only allowing arbitration.

    • StringTheory@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The CBS guy read aloud part of the thing he had to sign when he rode on it.

      And the video is horrifying on so many levels…

    • woteorin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised. But, I suspect there’s also a factor of just implausibility. Apparently, the main vessel they use is “experimental”, so it may just literally be impossible to have a recovery vessel without being a literal government.

      My money’s on this being the result of someone ignoring the “hey, these are not good conditions” warnings.

        • jellyfish@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The bit with the contract is @ 2:40:

          An experimental submersible vessel that has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body and could result in physical injury, disability, emotional trauma or death.

          There was some speculation the pressure vessel could have imploded, due to it being made out of thick fiber glass, which is like glass wherein any tiny imperfection under pressure can cause the entire vessel to break. This is why other pressure vessels are made out of stainless steel, they’re easier to inspect.

          If the vessel didn’t implode, there’s a decent chance it’s floating on the surface, but lost. This is because the ballast for these subs is heavy metal attached via electromagnet. Should anything go wrong, the magnets can be disengaged, and the sub with resurface.

          Here’s hoping it’s lost and can be found, imploding is a horrifying way to go, albeit a quick one.