LefterShark@lemmy.blahaj.zone to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoAirlines look to cut time spent on the tarmacwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up199arrow-down12
arrow-up197arrow-down1external-linkAirlines look to cut time spent on the tarmacwww.bbc.comLefterShark@lemmy.blahaj.zone to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33arrow-down1·3 months agoBut not at the expense of safety, right? Right?
minus-squareFlaqueman@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down2·3 months agoRight: The system uses machine learning to assign arriving aircraft to the nearest available gate with the shortest taxi time.
minus-squareempireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up46·3 months agoSooooooooo standard tree search that comp science students were doing in the 80s?
minus-squareWhatAmLemmy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down1·3 months agoBut now with AI!
minus-squareempireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down2·3 months agoSo it uses 20 high power Nvidia GPU’s instead of running on a single 5 watt microcontroller!
minus-squareWhatAmLemmy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoHow about you shut the fuck up and pay me money for this service you don’t need, and no-one asked for?
minus-squarehesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agoI’d imagine it would be more like CPU scheduling than tree traversal, but according to the article they just do it by hand now.
minus-squareempireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoSame difference- it’s a solved optimization problem that does not need “machine learning”.
minus-squarehesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoYeah, but it would be fun to figure out what they actually end up doing vs the marketing hype.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoAs long as a human being is there to handle exceptions.
But not at the expense of safety, right?
Right?
Right:
Sooooooooo standard tree search that comp science students were doing in the 80s?
But now with AI!
So it uses 20 high power Nvidia GPU’s instead of running on a single 5 watt microcontroller!
How about you shut the fuck up and pay me money for this service you don’t need, and no-one asked for?
I’d imagine it would be more like CPU scheduling than tree traversal, but according to the article they just do it by hand now.
Same difference- it’s a solved optimization problem that does not need “machine learning”.
Yeah, but it would be fun to figure out what they actually end up doing vs the marketing hype.
As long as a human being is there to handle exceptions.