So where’s the proof? If the Canadian government is going to make this kind of claim, they should cite their evidence. You don’t expect a guilty verdict without seeing the reasoning behind it.
Expressing your viewpoint on a conflict is not grounds to be deemed a terrorist in Canada. Here is the actual process.
Specifically:
The process of listing begins with criminal and/or security intelligence reports on an entity disclosing the reasonable grounds to believe that the entity has knowingly carried out, attempted to carry out, participated in or facilitated a terrorist activity; or the entity has knowingly acted on behalf of, at the direction of or in association with, an entity involved in a terrorist activity.
And none of what you provided is actually saying they funded a terrorist organization.
So where’s the proof? If the Canadian government is going to make this kind of claim, they should cite their evidence. You don’t expect a guilty verdict without seeing the reasoning behind it.
deleted by creator
Expressing your viewpoint on a conflict is not grounds to be deemed a terrorist in Canada. Here is the actual process.
Specifically:
And none of what you provided is actually saying they funded a terrorist organization.