• Tin@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    While I’m not a fan of RFK Jr., this seems to be a misinterpretation of what he’s saying. Regarding antidepressants, he said, “other psychiatric drugs, if they want to, to get off of SSRIs, to get off of benzos, to get off of Adderall, and to spend time as much time as they need…” (emphasis mine)

    It seems like, in addition to drug related offenses (which is its own rather thorny issue) he intends for this to be for people who want to stop taking SSRIs, benzos, and other psych meds and need support doing it. I’m not seeing any indication that this would be involuntary, and I’m certain that if he said anything like that the quote would be present, but it’s not.

    Having seen how devastating the withdrawal can be for some psych meds, even with tapering, I can’t say that this seems like a bad idea on its face. So many people try to quit psych meds and end up hospitalized; I’ve believed for a long time that there should be some sort of recovery program for people coming off of these medications, because they will 100% mess you up when you start taking less.

    Now, adderall I don’t really understand its inclusion here, because it isn’t known for withdrawal.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There is no such thing as addiction to antidepressants.

      This viewpoint is supported by the Mayo Clinic, The Cleveland Clinic, as well as this 2019 study published by the national institutes of health, which draws from decades of research.

      The above sources even clarify that withdrawal symptoms are not a sign of addiction.

      Many psychiatric conditions are incurable. As a result, these lifelong conditions can only be treated by the lifelong administration of medicine.

      Anyone who does not understand that should not have a say in public policy. Full stop.


      Think it through to its logical conclusion.
      ADHD does not go away. Depression (for many people) does not go away. Schizophrenia does not go away.
      What happens to those people if they ‘voluntarily’ agree to go to a labor camp but never wind up ‘cured’?
      Hint: They get worked to death.

      • Tin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        Many psychiatric conditions are incurable. As a result, these lifelong conditions can only be treated by the lifelong administration of medicine.

        I agree with you.

        And I’m willing to entertain that maybe the word ‘addiction’ has a connotation that I’m not seeing, but as far as I can tell, there is certainly a physical dependence upon SSRIs. No one is abusing SSRIs or getting high, but if they cause the same withdrawal symptoms as drugs of abuse, and as severely, what would you call it if not addiction? Honestly asking, because I’m willing to be educated here.

        What happens to those people if they ‘voluntarily’ agree to go to a labor camp but never wind up ‘cured’?

        I would certainly hope that such a facility would be staffed by medical professionals who would be able to recognize “Nope, you need medication” in those cases.

        Now, whether that’s what RFK is envisioning here is debatable. And it wouldn’t surprise me if he thought you could just put people to work and they wouldn’t need meds anymore. I have no desire to defend RFK or anyone else tapped to be in the next administration. I just don’t think it’s necessarily a bad idea to have a safe place available for people who need to deal with withdrawals for anything.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          Addiction has a medical definition, not a connotation.
          As previously shown, SSRI’s do not cause addiction, even if they can cause withdrawal or physical dependence for some people.

          I guess I’m wondering if support of this policy has to be riddled with asterisks and accompanied by statements that express hopes of how the programs will be run, then why express any support at all for them?

          And finally: There are safe places available for people to go if they feel they are having mental health issues that require more intensive care. Mind you, these are really only available to people with health insurance - Regan largely killed off federal and community mental health care in the 80’s. Care that cannot be replaced with a labor camp.
          The only proper replacement for that care is rebuilding that/those system(s), and that is not what RFK is proposing. He’s proposing a labor camp to take advantage of and imprison away vulnerable populations.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      “if they want to”

      So…

      The Chinese government has claimed that the Xinjiang re-education camps were voluntary educational centers aimed at combating extremism and teaching vocational skills…

      • DdCno1@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        They actually spread multiple different stories about what these concentration camps were. First they denied their existence outright, then satellite photos and documentation was published that proved these were real, so they claimed they were factories, schools, prisons for terrorists, etc. Many of these lies were published at nearly the exact same time.

        That’s how we know that they are actually concentration camps, that there is actually a genocide going on.