• TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Direct democracy needs to have some sort of concept of human rights enshrined in its system somehow, and make it very hard to violate, otherwise, it could get ugly. Mob rule isn’t always good. It could easily lead to torches and pitchfork “justice”.

    • StraponStratos@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      And representative rule doesn’t lead to “justice” presently?

      I’m so sick and tired of hearing this argument against direct democracy in that if it doesn’t solve every flaw we have today that it should be viewed skeptically.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not skeptically. Carefully. You can’t just say “okay, everyone vote on the laws directly” without thinking it through. You have to guarantee everybody’s rights, not just the ones who managed to overpower everyone else.

          • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Because I don’t want to crawl out of one shit hole only to fall into another hastily constructed one. Let’s get it right. Let’s learn from the past. We know how misinformation and mass propaganda manipulates people against themselves in our current system. We can act to prevent that. We know the people who start amassing more than a certain amount of wealth start becoming unstoppable. We can fix that too. We know how minority rights get trampled now. Let’s put safeguards in for that too.

            Like I said, let’s be careful. Or the new system will get taken over by greed, hate, and fear just like any other.