That’s a pretty bad example since most functional frameworks include an any or some function that returns early.
That’s a pretty bad example since most functional frameworks include an any or some function that returns early.
I mean it tends to show up in the FE due to JS being fundamentally callback based. You’re basically responding to events and the like. Unfortunately the language was not designed for reactivity so they’re all added on via frameworks.
Are there benefits in not having a GC in WASM?
Also are there mainstream memory safe languages without a borrow checker? There’s some experimental ones out there.
Rust isn’t strictly functional? Do you mean you’d like a language with garbage collection?
Yeah but they’re much more vulnerable to SAMs at altitude.
There are quads that can do 200+mph these days, only a matter of time before they’re cheap enough to be used to hunt down the helis.
It’s from Godzilla
Is it Amazon because they did a really good job at keeping teams separate (via APIs)?
I mean that just means you didn’t hack them well enough.
Huh? Every IDE has had this feature for decades. Eclipse, all of JetBrains products, even NetBeans. This is like the most basic feature provided by IDEs.
Also with the development of first party language servers it’s relatively easy for new IDEs to integrate.
Aren’t fluorescent bulbs the ones that flicker?
I agree about the color temperature.
What’s wrong with LED lights?
I’ve been following them for a while now and hope they can make it into production. Their focus on efficiency and repairability is quite exciting!
More than we can consume right now. We used to think this about oil as well. Humans will seek to reach this limit as quickly as possible. It will certainly create new technologies. However I don’t think it will solve scarcity problems for everyone since many of those issues are not resources or technology but politics. We choose to deprive certain humans of their basic needs.
I’m not certain near infinite energy will solve scarcity. Humans will simply use up all the available energy anyways until we eventually run out of whatever previously “infinite “ resource we’re using. We’re very good at this type of optimization.
That’s a lot of dirty parking lots you’re walking through… even the cleanest surfaces outside have way more dust and grime than inside.
Hmm… theoretically this is more efficient, however in practice you may end up with a dirty cache… I guess that’s fine if you don’t mind corruption of your coworkers.
Big companies do this all the time. Giant monorepos with good testing and reliability systems manage it. As an example: https://abseil.io/resources/swe-book/html/ch22.html
Yeah it would be nice if we could simplify instead of add a bunch of special cases.
However it’s easier said than done. In your example for carbon tax, how do you determine the cost of removing carbon? Does creating a new solar/wind power plant count? Does increasing efficiency in an existing home count? What’s the difference between that and just paying for carbon capture? This is what the carbon offset economy was supposed to be about but it’s ultimately difficult to implement correctly and inherently full of complexities. I’m not saying we shouldn’t try, but it’s really hard to simplify some things.
I think there’s evidence to show that even though punishments may be heavy, if the chance of getting caught is low people will still do it. So that means you’d need to increase surveillance and enforcement which comes with it’s own issues.
Supply chain makes the most sense. It’s not like pagers are used super commonly and I doubt they have good margins. Would be pretty easy to sneak something in.