That only works when there’s competition. There’s like 5 sites left on the Internet. It’s been centralized and monopolized.

I can’t imagine the series of incidents in your life that led you to draw such a wrong conclusion and yet call it logic.

You’ve really never heard the phrase “race to the bottom”?

Don’t use the passive voice.

Uber may restrict your hours because they don’t want to pay a fair wage.

As a society, we have a minimum wage for a very good reason.

We have minimum wage for a reason. We can’t allow companies to have a race to the bottom.

With personal vehicles sitting idle, I do think there should be scope left for some platform for drivers to offer services at any price at any time if they feel it is worthwhile. It increases mobility across the spectrum, and allows for better allocation of resources.

I don’t see why having drivere be employees would prevent this. If you’re driving, you’re on the clock. If you’re not, you’re not.

Alternatively, have a true network of contractors, with an Uber style company just creating a marketplace to facilitate connections between individuals offering and accepting rides. The company won’t set prices or schedules or payouts; it will allow drivers and riders to bid on fares. The company simply takes a small percentage from each transaction, or has a membership fee.

Many insurances require you to get a commercial policy. Others have a rideshare “rider” for additional coverage while working.

Banned for sinophobia

You are replying under a comment in which i said that receiving orders to invade another country is not a good thing.

Bending over backwards to avoid explicitly saying Russia did something bad lol

Yessss kick their ass Ukraine!

I’m down for more vodka. Everything else, fuck off with that shit.

Well I can’t really cite the whole of the English language to prove my point, can I? Trying to prove a negative is very difficult.

I defy you to find a single usage of illegal in contemporary writing that refers to neither laws nor games.

I’m just telling you how native people speak.

Nazi Punks Fuck Off!

Yeah, and unless you’re an ultra game nerd, using illegal to refer to breaking the rules is strange. Most people say “against the rules” or “non-permissible”. It’s a small, niche usage of the word.

You’ll notice the great majority of that definition talks about laws, with one minor exception for games.

Using “illegal” when referring to gameplay is already pushing it. It would raise eyebrows. Expanding it to encompass any set of rules is simply wrong.

Illegal specifically means against the law, not just against some private space’s set of rules.

Not an obligation, but a responsibility, imo.

What a terribly passive way to think.