This might be as a response after the interception of the South Korean drone near Pyongyang.

I’m no lawyer. I don’t know if GNU/Linux is subject to the U.S export regulations.

Read again: it was in Brazil.

Ceci n’est pas un NFT

I have been intercepting the .m3u download requests in the pages like a corsair in order to download the videos with ffmpeg. And let me tell you that it’s a PITA with how many anti-debug features these streaming sites include.

I’ll try this addon and see if it can end my misery.

and a bunch of F-15 apparently

I don’t understand… she has the right in islamic law to ask for divorce which she would have been granted by a judge seeing the abuse.

I think it is not possible in Christian law for a woman to ask for divorce except in the case of adultry, but Islamic law is clear about cases where the husband is abusive or doesn’t take his responsibilities. I just don’t get how people still consider Iran as a country that upholds Islamic law, unless they don’t know said law.

Curious how damaged they are.

One must have serious damage and no morals to do such thing

This reminds me of a question I heard long ago: if you take a copyrighted material A and XOR it with another material B, and then you distribute the result C, who can claim infringement if at all? The company which owns A or the one which owns B?

Especially that in order to actually claim infringement it means company A obtained a copy of the material of B in order to verify C infringes their rights.

Do you have kids?

To a close ally’s citizen…

Really?

Password: ********

No it is not.

But this law is now being misused to harass kids who are known to be Muslim although they comply with it by wearing something else.

For the non-frog eaters, the linked video is from a right-wing French TV station where they are asking a girl (left) who was denied entrance to her school because of her clothes. This is not a abaya she is wearing and she says other muslim and non-muslim girls wearing the same outfit got no problem going in that same morning. She is known to wear a hijab (which she removes upon being to school as required by the other law).

I will not comment on the interviewers trying to find fault in her or their ignorance.

Please, if you want to read on religious matters read from accredited scholars who know what they are doing. This is ridiculous to link a blog post from a web developer… The guy even is a Hadith (transmitted sayings and actions of the prophet, peace be upon him) rejector, making him a non-muslim.

Qur’anists - people who only consider Qur’an as the only source of religious law- are not considered Sunni (people following the Sunna, the teachings of the prophet transcribed in Hadith) who are the majority Muslims. Qur’anists are not taken seriously because they contradict their principle by not following the verses in the Qur’an ordering them to obey the Prophet because whatever he tells or does is part of divine revelation.

If you have a question pertaining to a health issue, you go to the doctor, not the baker.

The conclusions he draws are ludicrous too. The state not mandating it in a period of time has absolutely nothing to do with what the religion mandates. States and laws change, religion does not (except through prophets of God).

To use his last analogy: one needs to be qualified to write about a matter; him writing a blog post about it does not literally require that he is qualified.

Edit: I mean no disrespect to you, sorry if I came as rude. I just wanted to stress that there are many things you can find on the internet and one needs to get his information from reputable sources especially regarding such sensitive matters.

#jesuisabaya

People are oppressed in that part of the world, let’s oppress the ones in our country with the opposite this way they are more free!

It means not showing skin or curves

I have anecdotal experiences too: my sister is Muslim and was wearing hijab in France. Of her own will. My parents argued repeatedly AGAINST it because of all the problems she’d have (and she did have) in that glorious free country. But she wouldn’t budge, because she didn’t want a human to dictate to her what she could wear.

In many places such dress code is more cultural than religious. From the religious point of view, yes women are to wear it however one cannot FORCE them to. In some places they do, but the scripture does not allow this.

In secular countries people do not know the difference or don’t even bother because it mostly affects non whites. Instead of tracking the cases where there is abuse and dealing with them accordingly, they just ban it wholesale across the board. It’s like banning knives because some people use them violently.

I don’t deny that there are occurrences where some girls are forced. What about the 95% others?

You can’t put forth a law punishing the majority for a “likely”. What happened to the “Liberté Egalité Fraternité” which this liberticide law is obviously trampling?

The population has been fed the islamophobic narrative long enough to have such laws pass without anybody thinking about how ridiculous they are (replace hijab/abaya with dreadlocks or other piece of clothing… What do other people care?). The divide is so deep and constantly maintained by the politicians who, since they find no real answers the actual problems plaguing the day to day life of citizen, prefer to turn them against each other: divide to better rule.