Well in the 90s in Eater Europe we first had cable TV without subs or dub, just the original track (English, German, Italian, Spanish) so we had to learn the language just watching the shows trying to understand. Then subs started to be common and almost no dub. Then in late 2000s dubing started to be the norm for animations but movies are still subed and nobody likes dubed movies.

Truth be told he hasn’t got an original ideea since … Ok I don’t think he has got past that point yet.

Icm confident that until next year he will do it /s

Wait, isn’t X that app that evolved thorough multiple stages never reachig any just drowning in it’s own puss? Free speech platform -> all round financial app -> dating app -> future bullshit this conman can spew?

Thank you, I was searching for something like this.

Iny opinion is because this kind o forums are places where people who don’t like and don’t want to have kids congregate because they are able to express themselves without the peer pressure of the close society they live in.

No actually they won’t. Thought luck.

deleted by creator

You’re correct about the Appolo missions, but don’t tell me the Space Race was about science. It’s was fully politically motivated also. Without the Cold War nobody would have put the money and effort in so the Moon landing could happen in '69.

There are a lot of other missions that happened for pure scientific reasons but I don’t think this is one of them.

I understand your point of view and it’s correct but not realistic. This mission is bashed because it’s purpose was never science but propaganda. To validate a Phoenix like revival of the Russian empire. That they are strong and relevant on the world scene. The reactions to the failure were in tune with the intended purpose of the mission. Science (like usual) is the background of the political agenda.

Well your intention is admirable but childish.

Nobody gives a fuck about Russia’s scientific endeavours when they’re re starting the biggest military conflict in Europe since WWII and threatening everyone with a nuclear conflict.

Most probably any scientific progress that could be made will not be used for mankind’s progress but for the current militaristic propaganda.

They cannot be corrupt and amoral in the same time. Please choose :)

A not-so-ancient profecy states that there will be a drop in natality in China in the near future! :)

Well your right I wasn’t clear in my answer. They are open source but for the point of this discussion with open source software backed by an corporation the open source it’s just a mean of spreading “soft power” maybe gather inovation from the market and for sure to offer a way for FOSS creators to use their energies to build in the “correct” direction. The purpose it’s building a monopoly on certain aspects of the market.

Chromium is open source and a lot of small projects have sprouted from it but with the same undelying technology. Except for Firefox, Edge and Safary, everyone stems from the same roots controlled by google trough money and market share. So in this case Chrome dominates the market and decides the course of the industry. See mv3.

Android is open source and some projects are build on top of it but the big market share so the direction of the technology is controlled by Google.

Let them decide a stadard for pictures which has undeniable advantages and I bet you that tomorow they will decide how you share and visualise images and videos.

It’s not about being open source it’s about that project being a tool used by a company to spread their interests (which usually end up being predatory towards the common user).

Open source just like Chromium or Android, right? They’re open source also, right? 😈

Open source just like Chromium or Android, right? They’re open source also, right?

You could still be on the fence. It’s Google so for sure it has the possibility of tracking or some other user exploiting bullshit feature but we haven’t figure it out yet.

Bravo! Congratulations for you stance!

I see it as a first and necessary step. Remember the CFCs in deodorants and the effect of banning them?