Cool. Do Facebook next.
Cool. Do Facebook next.
Before 1996?
Why are we not angrier about css generally?
Sounds like the boss wanted a grid layout of some kind. Honestly, if they can express themselves in Excel, and they can be made to understand the limitations of responsive Web design, then it’s not so bad. At least it’s a requirement and you don’t have to guess.
Different countries have different sources of information about candidates.
I don’t live in the US but absorb quite a lot of political media from there. Number 1 rule is not to back Republicans, especially if you can’t find much information on them. There are Republicans up and down the ballot who are trying to implement a Christian Nationalist agenda, many of them on the down-low, and if you have no evidence either way it’s better to assume they are.
Next step is to google/bing/ddg the ones you’re considering and see what you can dig up on them and their opinions. Do they have a history of unsavoury social media posts? Do they go to church? Who is their pastor? What do they stand for? Are they incumbent, or have they previously held office? What did they say / vote for before?
Thank you for taking an interest in local and down-ballot races. Your participation is vital to keep fascists and lunatics out of school boards and sherrif’s offices.
The best way to avoid having your words used by an LLM is to mash your fingers with a mallet before typing. The resulting typographical errors will ensure that the AI rejects your text before using it for training.
I’m a SysOps engineer at a fairly large online casino.
Aaaaaand I’ve switched sides.
Post-2016 politics is a different animal.
Watch them. Start a podcast.
We don’t like that you’re telling OP to pick two when they’ve already picked two.
There’s always billions in new spending. It’s called inflation.
How do you know if someone is a bisexual vegan economics major who uses Linux? They’ve already told you.
We know. You keep telling us.
Of shit. And died. With a stomach full of shit. While moaning: “I now understand how much of a jackwad I’ve been! How very embarrassing! This serves me right!”
You should use Linux.
I’d say you’re more likely to get a positive response if you use words like “deceived” or “conned” or “lied to” which place the fault on the deceiver.
“Fooled” isn’t offensive per se; “chumped” is worse. But if I was wanting to convince someone that they had been maliciously given false information, I’d use language that doesn’t raise hackles by implicitly blaming them for being deceived.
Edit: “Played for a fool” is more offensive IMO, because now you’re pointing out that the victim has some exploitable flaw which allowed the deceiver to make a fool of them.
Edit again: Sorry for the double post. Something seems to be a little weird with my app.
I’d say you’re more likely to get a positive response if you use words like “deceived” or “conned” or “lied to” which place the fault on the deceiver.
“Fooled” isn’t offensive per se; “chumped” is worse. But if I was wanting to convince someone that they had been maliciously given false information, I’d use language that doesn’t raise hackles by implicitly blaming them for being deceived.
Also rings don’t make you invisible.
Pokemon Red: Rocket Edition is brilliant.