- Start working in morning - Photo 2
- Take a break and come back - Photo 1
- flow state
- Come back next day - Photo 2
- The saga continues… (Wu tang, Wu tang)
Depreciation graphs overlaid on each other would have been good
Yeah in reality it’s even the fourth or fifth copy-paste that actually warrants generalizing, inevitably I find some tweak I need to make to two of the places to render the original generalization a waste of time
But if you are going to copy and paste make sure you keep it as similar as possible to the other instances to make it easy to refactor if you revisit in future
That network of contractors is a pretty cool idea, I think that’s the kind of network I would like an exception carved out for.
The other commenter made a fair point that its commercial viability is questionable, but as the world changes I’d still want to leave to scope to try.
I have many issues with Uber as a corporation - their treatment of customers, employees and drivers. But with case law, I have concerns for the precedent this sets.
Ruling drivers as employees risks removing scope for a ridesharing services entirely, and locks ad hoc transportation to the old inefficient taxi system.
With personal vehicles sitting idle, I do think there should be scope left for some platform for drivers to offer services at any price at any time if they feel it is worthwhile. It increases mobility across the spectrum, and allows for better allocation of resources.
I think the bigger issue is why Uber has so much leverage to control the pricing and terms of drivers in the first place, and why there aren’t more alternatives to force them to be competitive.
GOTO 42069