I have worked for companies that have rules stating no logos/brand names could be noticeable. So a black pair of shoes that had a Nike check on it would be considered unacceptable. I always worried the dickies emblem on my work pants might cause issue. White socks were an issue which since you are wearing long pants and shoes… shouldn’t even be noticeable. All tattoos had to be covered, no facial hair allowed, and no piercings. Hair color must be a natural color.

I think the concept behind BLM is good, but I would have never thought wearing a mask with their logo on it would be allowable work attire.

Shoot, Im on android with Jerboa right now, is connecg or Sync for just iOS for now?

Hitting enter whilst expecting a “how to google” response, haha

Meh, people proved that wrong with glory holes, only really have to fit 1 person and an access point.

My only thought (plausable excuse) is that he is possibly sucking up while expressing discontent under the false pretense maybe Musk will pay him losses. Whether he likes him or not, he should know someone thay disagrees with him will not get paid but rather sued for existing.

Yeah, Id prefer them to just make the phone wider, fit a bigger battery since the width is back, throw the aux port back in. Also a rf blaster like years ago would be nice. (Universal remote apps)

deleted by creator

Teaching a kid there is a time and place to use their devices is educational. Confiscating personal property to limit access is just creating problems.

Also, who is paying for the $2000 smart phone that got cracked/lost/stolen while confiscated?

As I said in a comment above, good luck not getting sued by the parents during a school shooting / emergency and their kid cannot contact them.

The first school shooting that a student wasn’t able to call/text their parent would result in every parent suing and this being reversed.

Let me play it back.

1. Woke is to be aware / including being against slavery and for human rights.

2. You said you were against people “pushing woke”

3. That means you would be against people pushing awareness for womens rights and anti slavery.

4. I was saying don’t say you are against people pushing woke if you are not under those beliefs.

That is all. Media such as Fox news and politicians are intentionally trying to distort a term and make it hated. Then trying to put things they don’t like under that term to make people not like those things.

It’s like me saying I am against the use of the color red, and wondering why red shirts fall under that.

So you are saying you are woke when it comes to women’s rights.

Also it is widly agreed that trans won’t compete competitively in professional sports for women.

If you don’t want people to see you as being against/for said things, don’t say you are.

The point was don’t say pushing woke shit on people and not realize that means pushing anti-slavery values and equal rights for women, etc.

Well that’s bullshit.

Also anyone anti-woke is by definition must fall into a category of pro slavery, pro women not being able to vote, anti civil rights, pro totalitarianism… and the list would go on. Anti-woke would mean asleep and letting the world piss all over you and you never even noticing.

But sure though, hold onto your “programed” terms like woke and ride them into your ignorant rabbit hole.

Likely thought they were going to shoot him and was attempting suicide before being dishonorable discharged.

You’re right, I was clearly tired. I deleted the post saying divide instead of multiply haha. I need to catch up on some sleep.

deleted by creator

Same bullshit as always. No one will end up paying an amount that will “re-pay” sufficiently. Instead it just goes back to hoping tech advancments move us to cleaner energy quickly.

(Aka. If they were going to pay x per footprint, they instead would pay x/y)

More likely it would just get negotiated that costs needed to be less per emissions and then they had x years to make efforts to prove they are mitigating as much as possible. And the same old shit would carry on as it is right now.

(Not saying this is what I want, just that this is how it seems)

Measure by emissions within your country. If China allows a company to operate within their borders they are responsible for said fees. Pass the fees to those companis if you wish, but they are their lands. The companies will move elsewhere if the fees are to high or find alternative ways to do business producing less emissions. It really isn’t tough to figure out.

You realize that paying C02 emissions based on capita for a country makes no sense. If you believe a country should be paying than it pays per country impact. So that would stipulate that China needs to be paying twice what the U.S. does… which I somehow imagine you aren’t going to agree with.

deleted by creator

I want neither. I also want different democrats as well, but this will be another election of shit vs crap again by the early looks of it.