Either a troll or a moron lol. They aren’t even laying out any sort of argument, just repeating the same shit (on what I can only assume is an electronic device that “slaves” made for them to purchase)

What about the human rights of half of humanity that you’re calling to be wiped out? Lmao

Hey, a civil internet conversation! I’ll take it, cheers!

I agree with you that prohibition isn’t the way to do things. In my opinion the war on drugs is a waste of tax payers money and more importantly human life stuck behind bars. If you are speaking against criminalization of substances I’m with you. I’m however, not against harm reduction and education, including warning labels on products that are harmful.

Sure I’ll establish it with in context. Just because “other things are also dangerous” doesn’t mean warning should not be on the label of a known carcinogen. This is coming from someone who drinks more than he should.

Putting a warning on the label of a product known to cause harm isn’t “controlling others”. You are free to still consume the product. It is allowing you to make an informed choice, even if you are unaware or unable to access that information from other sources.

Slippery slope fallacy.

Oh yeah you’re really sticking it to them by continuing to use their platform!

Why can’t it be both? Especially when guns are so interwoven into the culture.

So it’s not a mass shooting if the person is black and the crime is personal? What led you to come with that criteria? I tend to think “A mass shooting is a violent crime in which an attacker kills or injures multiple individuals simultaneously using a firearm.” is a pretty fair definition. You know “mass” as in several individuals involved and “shooting” as in a firearm was involved. Keep it up with the mental gymnastics though.

Yep its basically like Netflix before it shit the bed.