Since you’ve obviously forgotten, they share the same God and origin story as the Hebrews and Christians, and He’s known for working in mysterious ways, so who knows which side He’s taking on any one day?
Since you’ve obviously forgotten, they share the same God and origin story as the Hebrews and Christians, and He’s known for working in mysterious ways, so who knows which side He’s taking on any one day?
EDIT FOR THE DOWN VOTERS:
Has it really, though? Or are they mostly unreported corpses still collecting pensions? And screwing up the data our doctors are using to tell us about “healthy living”?
Still, wouldn’t you at least check your devices after yesterday?
Just anyone in an airplane or bus or subway with them
“the ruling from the court held Ms Joksimovic was strangled to death.”
CSI Switzerland must be fucking wizards, man.
You mean I’ve been shiftkeying all these years for nothing?!?
They specifically said “the Israeli government.”
Not planning to scrutinize your Zabar’s receipt. Nor your sincerity.
(If you aren’t Jewish, substitute the pronouns, using “their” muddled my meaning. And “our” made it too personal.)
There are people who lump in all Jews as Netanyahu sympathizers, but most of us have the capacity to separate wheat from chaff.
Now, plurals aside, which is better,
The 60s
Or
The '60s
?
That would be the sensible thing to do, but we are talking about Moist&Musky here, so we can’t assume.
If it was a tree farm, were the trees for wood, and harvested as usual, or did they go to waste? Couldn’t they have been relocated, since their root balls were probably all separate? It’s not the catastrophe of an ancient forest, but it’s still a negative.
By decades they meant “the 1970s” or “the 60s”
I don’t know if we can rely on British popularity, given y’all’s prevalence of the “greengrocer’s apostrophe.”
Well I certainly hope you are right and it does make a difference. Without a robust mechanism for enforcement it will be worse than useless. Which was the point of their joke, and which you did not address.
So you’re saying they got the joke, they’re just disagreeing with the sarcastic remark. Maybe. I have reread it and it still doesn’t sound funny to me, was it meant to? If not, does whoosh apply?
And more importantly, why am I trapped in this woodshed?
Couldn’t get a semiautomatic.
(Which was a good thing for everyone else but a problem for his goals.)
Title sounds like a walks-into-a-bar joke setup.
Hope serious progress happens.
Surely there’s not much nutrition in sucking balls… Even if you suck dick, you’d have to go from dick to dick like a hummingbird to live off it…
Might be more effective to make him stay in it, all the way down
Didn’t you see this the other day in the news?
https://theconversation.com/the-data-on-extreme-human-ageing-is-rotten-from-the-inside-out-ig-nobel-winner-saul-justin-newman-239023
Feel free to come at the story from another source, it’s legit peer-reviewed research. Of course my choice of “mostly” was exaggeration with humorous intent.