Not white people in photo.

Photo is of people white people brought here for indentured labour

;)

Anyways, my greater point is that we’ve been an immigrant nation for a good while now. Little rude to pull the ladder behind us.

The deliciousness of the descendants of white colonizers complaining about new people settling on “their” land.

Ref : Ontario

Strategically, I think the Liberals should be waiting until as close as possible to the election call. It stops the conservatives having time to pivot to a campaign strategy that isn’t “Trudeau Bad”

Having just gone through the LaSalle Causeway “repair” drama; it might be easier to just demolish and replace the bridge. But I’m not sure how historically significant this one is.

I would like that. Works well in Québec.

Also literally every car. Why the hell is my sexual activity in the privacy agreement KIA?

https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/blog/privacy-nightmare-on-wheels-every-car-brand-reviewed-by-mozilla-including-ford-volkswagen-and-toyota-flunks-privacy-test/

I wore my councilor an email saying: hey maybe our city should speak out about this bullshit, Guelph is writting a letter, we could do that?

He got me back with: we’re workshopping it; but letters are a bad idea, they piss of this government and then you just end up with random retribution.

So those are the clowns we have running the province.

Bit early yet for the minutes, but they should get posted here:

https://afn.ca/events/sca-fncfs/

Sarkaria added that he frequently hears from drivers who say their commute times have increased on routes with bike lanes.

Time to call the constituency office for Brampton South and the Ministry office to counter the driver’s calls.

Brampton South constituency office is: 905-796-8669

For all Ontarians (or people who sometimes travel in Ontario) the ministry office is: 416-327-9200

I’m not sure how these are different from already existing psych holds?

In Québec a convience store is called a dépanneur.

Then buy you beer from a dép.

Ontario and Québec are still very much on the bagged milk train.

Source: my fridge.

In Kingston, I’ve heard to janitorial staff needing to clear needles and remove tresspassers off the grounds at the boys & girls club, and a school that are the closest to the SCSs. I don’t know how the volume of cleaning compares to schools farther away from the SCS. My data is also hearsy, but comes from someone who works with the community.

I’ll also say Kingston concentrates support services geographically, which leads to concentrations of people using these services geographically. This is something I didn’t see in other cities where services are more spread out around.

Yes, I mean to say the organizations are volunteering to fill this health requirement. I think there was a long in translation theirs.

All of these organizations: https://ohrn.org/meet-our-networks/

Some are publicly owned, most aren’t, none of them are provincial.

if the choice is between having the safe consumption site close to your kids’ school and having people doing their drugs in the open near your kids’ school and leaving their used needles lying on the playground, which are you going to pick?

SCS

Often, these places are where they are because that’s where their clients already are.

Are they? Or is it just close enough the areas where underfunded volunteer organisations are able to get a physical site.

You may also want to measure out the radius of 200m from every school or daycare in your town or city on a map and see how many places are left where they can park SCSs.

This is neighborhood dependant. Somewhere like Sud-ouest in Montréal? Impossible. Somewhere like a Kingston suburb, a lot of real estate.

But that’s a great point, allow me to rephrase, the SCS sites should be an appropriate safe distance from schools; what that distance is is going to vary greatly between neighborhoods and their densities; and even the day trip programming of these schools (as an example if daycare always does their walks north to a canal which has playgrounds, then a SCS any distance along that route isn’t great, but a site to the south could be super close.

Figuring out where they’ll do more good than harm is more important than enforcing arbitrary limits.

Agreed, but this needs to be looked at holistically, not solely for the clients. That requires understanding the communities these sites are going into, and funding sites appropriately so selection isn’t based on funding.

Note that the government isn’t talking about moving SCSs outside of their arbitrary 200m zone from schools, they’ve simply announced their outright closure.

This is the crux. I don’t really want a safe consumption site near my kids’ school or daycare. I even think 200m is probably insufficient for a distance from a school or daycare. (I don’t know what the actual distance should be, 200m just feels insufficient)

But I also want SCSs. Literally just move them. The infrastructure demand is not that intense.

Nope, America is the pants and Alaska is the hat.

America is Canada’s pants AND hat.