Paradoxvoid

All it takes is some standardized markup like schema.org

Which is the problem AI is solving here - getting every supermarket chain to agree on this (when it’s actually against their interests to do so, since it increases price transparency) would be an impossible task, but AI can get around this requirement with minimal extra effort.

I’m hardly an AI evangelist, but this is actually one of the rare situations where it’s a good fit.

The amount of people bootlicking a corporation’s decision to cut costs rather than just moderate effectively is pretty astonishing for Lemmy,

Plenty of people got value out of the comment section - if nothing else, they were invaluable in knowing when to skip past the recap/opening theme/filler content in long-running shows like One Piece.

Most of it is pretty inane, but there was some useful stuff in there, and I always found it fun to see what other people thought of particularly crazy episodes.

If I really hate front end, but still want a lot of the responsiveness of a SPA, I’d have to give ASP.NET Blazor a serious thought.

It’s largely all back end driven, with the dynamic elements driven via webassembly that pretty much works like black magic.

Ok but who actually doesn’t know what a magazine is

Kbin devs, apparently.

While I don’t think using RNG is a good mechanic (and in Overwatch, most ‘random’ things aren’t actually very random - bullet spread is actually based on a set pattern, and the only randomness is the rotation of that pattern.

However there are interesting ways you could dress up ‘randomness’ as an actual game mechanic that’s reproducible - causing allies to have a slight bullet magnetism (not full on aimbot, but a bit like a ‘lite’ version of S76’s ult) could be an interesting idea to play around with.

Another option could be to force things to bounce, and otherwise orient themselves onto a specific target - though I guess this might be more along the lines of someone controlling magnetism than ‘luck’ per se.

I played him a bit yesterday, and I actually really like the changes. For such a small difference, the inclusion of the trap and the heal/damage reduction being on a resource allows you to be a bit more strategic in his general play, and reduces a lot of the brainlessness that comes in the gap between hook coming off cooldown.

There isn’t quite the dopamine hit of insta-deleting someone once they’re hooked, but you can still do it (even if it’s much harder) and by pulling people into pig-pen it’s largely still possible.

Again, revenue. They report revenue because it’s a nice big number, but it’s different to profit (which is why a lot of people suspect they don’t make much actual money, if any).

Revenue, sure - I don’t believe Google shares profit numbers for Youtube separately to the rest of the portfolio. I could be misinformed though.

Like legit, some of these comments are utterly deranged. YouTube has ZERO competition in the mass market consumer space, everyone else is a niche player, and it’s debatable whether YouTube even turns a profit despite that.

If we want authors to survive, we’ve got to stop assuming that authors’ intellectual labour is a public commodity.

The irony being that this is exactly what copyright was originally intended to facilitate - authors creating works to become public domain within a relatively short period of time.

I’d also argue Firefox is hardly mainstream at ~3% usage. Edge would be a better replacement given it comes with every Windows install (and many corporate environments don’t allow using an alternative).

To add to that, heroes having unique effects is what has in the past led to over-centralising metas that everyone complains about and the devs have made comments saying they’re trying to avoid that happening again.

Complain all you like about AKB’s handling of OW, but you can’t deny that their animation department consistently hits out of the park - am really looking forward to the full reveal since Sojourn’s personality has always felt kinda flat in-game.

And that’s not even getting into how banks worldwide have been cutting down on staff numbers for years, and directing people to just their apps instead.

The major point is not so much whether your browser could block ads - your point regarding the browser ultimately having to render each element is true. The problem is that if the web server gets a request from an unattested browser (such as an old version, or one that has an ad blocker installed), it will refuse to serve any content, not just ads.

Regular people will inevitably get frustrated and we end up in scenarios like “<x browser>is bad, it doesn’t work with <y site>” because of this proposal, and more and more people end up switching until you have to use a compliant (Chromium-based) browser to do anything at all on the internet, and Google’s strangehold on web standards solidifies even further.

As much as we can (and should) lambast Facebook/Meta’s C-Suite for terrible decisions, their engineers are generally pretty legit.

In what elo hell would you rather have an Orisa rather than monke?