How does this article show it was a valid defence? They withdrew, as they knew it clearly wasnt going to work for them, so im not sure what your point is…

1. I’ll eat my hat if that turns out to be a working defence for Disney, so as a reason to pirate, it’s pretty feeble.

2. Duh?

3. Hardly. Hollywood is breaking box office records every other month, and the pirating community is very, very small compared to the larger population. Have you looked at video game prices lately? Movie ticket prices? Theyre out of control, seemingly not bothered by piracy in the slightest. Studio lawyers are going after piracy because they have nothing else better to do then pursue every point of revenue increase they possibly can, including going after the small fish.

But you forgot the biggest reason…It’s free.

The large majority of people who pirate couldn’t give a shit about “digital media preservation”. Sure, people all have their own reasons, but to the other commentors point, most people are gonna delete shit right after they listen/play/watch it. Storage space is expensive.

Totally agree. The self aggrandizing, “hero of digital media preservation” thing is getting a bit ridiculous.

No luck today i guess, haha, tried that code and it seems its been used as well. Appreciate you trying though :)

Damn, i thought I was quick, lol

Love this

Because bank accounts are high score counters to these people

Yeah, I have to agree that the ‘send as’ can be a pain, would be nice if it sent as the recipient email by default. As far as people spamming looking for a legit address, I’ve fortunately not run into that, but I could see how that could happen.

I went with Pro for the custom domains and catch-all inbox. Now I can give out whateveriwant@mydomain.com and it will get back to me. It’s nice for easily identifying phishing, plus you can set up filters to trash emails to a particular address automatically, so if one of your addresses gets compromised you can just filter them out. Also, it’s nice to see who’s selling your info!

Sweet, I didn’t think so, but doesn’t hurt to check!

I, too, praise the uptime, so your first suggestion sounds perfect!

Thanks again

Awesome write up, thanks for taking the time!

Definitely seems like docker is the way to go. I’ve currently got my NAS connected via ISCSI, but will I need to change that up when moving to docker?

I’m familiar enough with Linux to cludge my way through most things, but this will be my first time with docker (honestly stoked to learn it).

So would you suggest I get things squared away in docker first, then move things over, or should I fresh build everything directly into docker? Are there any weird artifacts or config issues with importing a backup from an existing windows installation of the *darr apps or similar?

Mvp