Primarily0617

you need to be able to have vacations and save for retirement and do fun things from time to time

ahem actually people only need to exist and survive until they work themselves to death getting tangled in the gears of my spinning jennys

It takes a certain amount of energy for water to exist as water, a certain amount of energy for oxygen to exist as oxygen, and a certain amount of energy for hydrogen to exist as hydrogen

The amount of energy it takes for water to keep being water is less than the sum total of the energy it takes for oxygen and hydrogen to keep being themselves.

When you burn hydrogen, it combines with oxygen in the air and makes water. But that requires less energy to exist, so where does the excess energy go? It’s released as heat.

To split water back into hydrogen and oxygen, you have to re-add that same amount of energy again.

Hydrogen as a fuel isn’t so much a source of energy as a store of energy. A battery doesn’t make energy. You charge it with energy so that you can retrieve that energy later. Similarly, a big power plant electrolyses a bunch of water and makes a bunch of hydrogen. Later, you can use that hydrogen in your car without having to be connected to the big power plant that made it.

this is all probably largely wrong and you should ignore it chemistry SUCKS

What’s an alternative that features the presents-giving at the same time of year

Festivus is explicitly non-commercial

powerful isn’t the same as well-structured

it was written to be a language that anybody could read or write as well as english, which just like every other time that’s been tried, results in a language that’s exactly as anal about grammar as C or Python except now it’s impossible to remember what that structure is because adding anything to the language to make that easier is forbidden

when you write a language where its designers were so keen for it to remain human readable that they made deleting all rows in a table the default action, i don’t think “well structured” can be used to describe it

sql syntax doesn’t support even itself correctly i fail to see your point

if you don’t believe that adding more structure to the absolute maniacal catastrophe that is sql is a good thing then i’m going to start to have doubts about your authenticity as a human being

that’s a gibibyte

a gigabyte is 10^9

the point of the original post is that artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training is a bad idea because it ends up in weird scenarios like this one

your comment is saying that the original post is dumb and betrays a lack of knowledge because artificially fixing a bias in training data post-training would obviously only result in weird scenarios like this one

i don’t know what your aim is here

any AI person training their algorithms on AI generated data is liable to get fired

though this isn’t pertinent to the post in question, training AI (and by AI I presume you mean neural networks, since there’s a fairly important distinction) on AI-generated data is absolutely a part of machine learning.

some of the most famous neural networks out there are trained on data that they’ve generated themselves -> e.g., AlphaGo Zero

but that is not a fix

congratulations you stumbled upon the reason this is a bad idea all by yourself

all it took was a bit of actually-reading-the-original-post

it’s not the fact that A^2 + B^2 = C^2 that’s important, it’s the proof

there’s been evidence for ages that previous civilizations used it

y’all don’t understand we’re going by a dangerous route

who knew that pre-game handshakes were load bearing when it came to the apparent house of cards that is modern society

You’re the one putting scale in there

You are factually incorrect on point 2

So I can eat 2000 calories in pure sugar and feel full for the whole day?

point 1 was already addressed in my comment

You said it didn’t matter in America but that it does matter globally, but we’re not talking about globally, because we’re talking about how milk forms part of the typical American diet.

That’s not addressing anything.

No it wasn’t.

Eating meat isn’t the same thing as rationalising that it isn’t contributing.

Also, it’s now perfectly possible to exist in society without eating meat at all. The evidence being all the people who go about their lives doing exactly that.

is not a comparison in terms of scale of harm

I’m still missing the part where it’s equating Jews to farm animals.

Milk is a staple of many American diets

North America systemically over-consumes, hence its obesity crisis.

the 90 calories you are missing will be made up elsewhere in your diet

this doesn’t accurately represent a person’s relationship with food

you’re doing this

*implicitly comparing the treatment of Jews during the holocaust to the treatment of cattle today

also, you can compare two things without equating them

I think if you actually cared about the words you wrote, you wouldn’t have used them as the basis of a lazy strawman to win an argument on the internet against veganism

Humans evolved to eat animals.

humans also evolved to die from cholera before the age of 3 what’s your point

B12 is an essential vitamin whose primary source is meat and dairy

so add b12 to foods, or take b12 supplements

I am child free

not having children because you never wanted children isn’t an argument unless you avoided having them specifically for the climate

you’re allowed to eat meat, but can we please stop with all the limp-wristed excuses for why it’s actually morally justifiable and just own it?