- 17 Posts
- 18 Comments
453·11 months agoI really like being able to edit the post title and the 6 hour top sort. Although I would like 3 or 4 hours even better.
bicarbonate and water painted
That’s what I’ve ended up doing, I’ve covered the spots with the bicarbonate and water paste and will leave it overnight and then I’m going to spray it with vinegar and remove it.
Google Gemini Powered AlphaCode 2 Technical Report
HumanEval achieved 74.4%, surpassing GPT-4 at 67%. It successfully solves 43% of problems in the latest Codeforces rounds with 10 attempts. The evaluation considered the time penalty, and it still ranks in the 85th percentile or higher. AlphaCode 2 already beats 85% of people in top programming competitions (which are already better than 99% of engineers out there). So, I believe AI already writes better short code than the average programmer, but I don’t think it can debug any code yet. I’d say it will need a platform to test and iteratively rewrite the code, and I don’t see that happening earlier than 3 years.
deleted by creator
2·1 year agoI like ttf-hack-nerd and ttf-sourcecodepro-nerd
Cool, that’s what I was looking for. Thanks!
What I’m really looking for is the same tagging method of image boards where everyone collaborates tagging content. I think hashtags are just spam and tags are non disruptive metadata that can actually help organize content.
I don’t know how image boards manage it, but they are always curated properly; I’ve yet to see troll tags.
No it just writes the patch text that I pass split in chuncks with a git commit message for each of the chuncks, but I’m the one who has to copy that and perform the commit
9.71KB paste
write brief git commit messageFix archive checking
- Refactor to use functions for common logic
- Check archive file after downloading playlists
- Remove aliases, simplify main commands
- Minor cleanups
I started asking this later
write brief git commit message using Conventional Commits style and bullet points, split into smaller chunks if necessary specifying the chunks
If a glorified autocomplete algorithm can write more informative and concise commit messages than you, the actual author behind the code, I think you need to sit down and think long and hard what that actually implies.
I don’t need to think long and hard to realize how lazy I am. Only a stupid person would need to think long and hard to realize something so simple.
And you are probably referring to the LLM generated post anyway, because I never said that it can write “more informative and concise commit messages than me”. You are the one saying that.
Why do you need to spend a “considerable amount of time crafting commit messages?”
I haven’t wrote that, it’s LLM output. My commit messages usually are variants of ‘changes’, ‘fixed’, ‘updated’ or ‘asdfasdf’
I made a community. This is what I wanted to show. https://reddthat.com/post/6792924
Go back to Reddit?
No, that one has more effort put into it.
And am I supposed to take your word or the one from the BBC for it? Why not link something from a less biased source, like from a country that doesn’t host any US military.