Remmock

My guy is talking about a controlled environment with scientific processes and y’all here talkin’ like he wants to chuck it on a few logs.

The Economist is inherently fascist because it exists both as a product of and to foment capitalism.

I will accept that you can’t see how they’re related.

It’s interpretable as a sarcastic response to someone taking a position against Spez, catchphrase or no. This doesn’t seem hard to understand.

Do you have the same issues with people who learn Valspeak or AAVE?

Catchphrases have cultural significance of having a shared understanding of the intent, both delivered straight and ironically. Your attitude is not conducive to a shared experience.

Or are you suggesting that you never use quotes of any kind, regardless of the source?

Bestowing +1 Dopamine

Henry? Is that you?

I’m not surprised they didn’t get any traction.

Nobody would be if it was up on wood blocks.

Fashion designers are being replaced by AI.
Investment capitalists are starting to argue that C-Suite company officers are costing companies too much money.
Our Ouroboros economy hungers.

Would you not be Mmm Aspersion?

Legally speaking, if you didn’t intend to kill them it actually does change the consequences.

It’s commonly used when you pick up a radio on a public band.

So if you have a jobsite where there are 100 radios, and someone needs to reach Ted, they’ll page the radio and say something like “Hey Ted, do you copy?” and Ted will respond with “Go for Ted,” which means yes, Ted is here and he’s listening, go ahead.

It was used in a small way some 40 years ago and never really caught on.