Ok i implemented it into the bot and it took about 1 hour and 6 minutes to fetch all links and i am now implementing the part where it is inserted into the new text.

Ok i will look into it, thanks i thought it was just the sources not the code.

No, i dont get it from where he would get that idea, because see c/politics mods wanted the bot gone and we removed it no question asked.

@jordanlund@lemmy.world if you really dont want the bot here we can remove the bot and shut the bot down ( please consult other c/world mods too )

By “adding” i mean adding it into the field higher than MBFC ( as i personally think wikipedia is a little bit better for that ).

new:

Wikipedia: Reliability consensus is mixed…l ( whatever the scrapper scrapes ) MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Search Wikipedia about this source

I would like to implement your code into the bot myself so i can learn how you would do it. If you are willing to share your code, please send me a github link ( or invite me if you want it to be private between you and me ) or if its super simple just send it in the dms.

MBFC API is free as they gave us access for us as a Non Profit.

We already had in mind adding these sources to our bot but we didnt had the time and knowledge how to scrape that. Personally i would like to host it on our own server so that we dont require you to use your own money just for one bot, in what programming language did you write it?

Thanks a lot!
Rooki

About https://codeberg.org/ArtisanByteCrafter/pytube-gui/issues/7 Would it be ok if i try the playlist integration or do you want to do your things first?

Works pretty good but basic error handling is missing. I made a issue and a PR for it already. My first try at streamlit.

I know that ;) It was still sadge

In other words: “We dont want to repair your ‘New’ Ninetendo 3DS so scr*w you”

Its not a beacon of truth and facts lol. Mbfc isnt right everywhere.

Comment on the bots response with what you found, to notify them.

Having nothing and being a “trust me bro, this source is lit and unbiased” is better?

• source: Trust me bro

Having nothing and being a “trust me bro, this source is lit and unbiased” is better?

• source: Trust me bro

We are collecting all the feedback here: https://lemmy.world/post/18775630

We are trying to come to a better solution ( except removing fully the bot ).

You can even be better than that! You can make a community that fact check news article / news pages. Then we can add the threads from that community to the bot and have there news page specific discussion.

Thanks for the feedback. With the new format we will think about it, but i think this is pretty good.

We will discuss this and come back to you. We would love to open sourc ethe bot but the code quality for reading is not in a good state. We will have to clean the code up. But we will be working for that.

They have a point but strict fake news it isnt. It is not an option to leave it without any second bias opinion. Its not banning anyone. If you dislike it and demand it to be shutdown for democracy. Then you arent allowing other opinions.

Overwhelmingly negative? Those are the 24/7 negative users. We do anything: Those guys: THIS IS IS A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY

So you stand alone in that statement. See the post vote score.

We give you the option to block it. Block it.

No we dont. We saw the expected “ReMoVe ThE BoT” comments, because MBFC did hurt their feelings by not rating their favourite newspage the highest creditability on earth.

And just block it, then you can imagine how it is without the bot.

See reply in support post