That’s what I wondered, thanks!
Nobody likes a sucker, especially the kind that fall for fruit tarts like you. I knew there was trouble. I could smell it on the hot evening breeze. Fortunately for me, trouble is my favorite thing… Because I’m Joe Milkshake. I kicked down the door with one swift, decisive motion.
That’s what I wondered, thanks!
I disagree. Discord asked for my phone number when I tried to sign up, probably because I used a throwaway mail address and it detected that. No thanks.
Haven’t run it but the contents look legit, just in case anyone wonders if they should risk downloading a random file from a stranger online, thanks Jack Sparrow!
It’s windows, so an exe, I will need to check if it runs later in Linux, not sure when I get to that.
Do I seriously need to sign up on discord to get this?
Thank you! Also thanks for not getting discouraged to answer by all this comment mess.
Would be nice if you could elaborate what exactly you did different than all the others?
Edit: jeez, guys. It was just a question since they said “none of the others met their needs” so I was interested in that? Did that sound that rude? I am not a native English speaker, so I am not sure now. They are completely OK to ignore my question. But cool, will not ask that again and ignore such posts in the future.
Yeah and that’s actually exactly the problem that they are trying to solve. No one is taking any phone calls in class, they are browsing tiktok and diss each other on YouTube and whatever.
Yeah, we don’t call them that anymore! Get with the times!
It’s also a plot point in the movie “only lovers left alive”, where the vampires get their blood from medical doctors who guarantee its quality.
Bio…graphy?
It is easy to make if you have the know how and some equipment, also if it is already known what you need to make. For example, aspirin is known structurally (unless I am mistaken), so if you have the chemistry know-how and equipment, you can make your own.
However the tricky part is to get it as a safe medicine to take, that you do not have impurities that could be dangerous, toxic. You will need to be able to make quality and safety checks like that. Which I am not sure how easy that really is.
Oh, I don’t argue about loudness, cooling or size. For me the defining factor of a good long term storage is reliability, and I have read somewhere you cannot store an SSD unpowered over long periods of time or you’ll get data loss. Again probably not a factor for this system as you just keep it powered then.
SSD are not great for long term storage, right? Guess this isn’t a backup system but more of a system to have files available on multiple devices.
You had to change trackers and clients, so yeah, that’s pretty much the same for torrenting as changing your go to site for streaming.
But you are right about Soulseek, that never changed, which is amazing.
Data is stored in a log file, which is why I wondered if someone already made a solution that just parses that and presents it as graphs. Couldn’t find that myself but seems like it does not exist.
I get your point and it was an emergency option to at some point take time and do it myself, sure. But that is not what I asked, not even sure when I have the time to do this.
Ugh, I wish *holding crying bag*
one bit of unpaid writing I don’t need to do now!
So you’re just like a high impact journal, eh?
Because the system is rigged in more ways.
I will try and keep it short.
There is a metric associated with scientific journals called impact factor. You can read up somewhere how its calculated but it is essentially a number that boils down how often a journal’s papers are cited.
The higher impact factor your paper gets from getting published the better you look. Its reputable.
This stuff is important when you apply for research grants or new positions within academia. If you have a candidate that published regular high impact versus one that doesn’t, there isn’t much reason to choose the one that doesn’t.
However, as you might have guessed, the system is flawed and one shouldn’t rely on impact factors as a measure. However, everyone keeps doing it because it is a simple 1 number metric and everything else is a lot more work to evaluate quality with.
Now a new journal cannot just come in and offer cheap prices because they start without or with low impact factor. They have to build that first over several years with fantastic papers cited by tons of people. You cannot achieve that easily.
Sounds great right? Scientific papers essentially reinvented printing money and now act as if there is no other way to handle this. Add to that, that they give no two craps about scientific integrity or misconduct and there is a small hope scientists might slowly get fed up with the system.
Thanks for posting the next version as well! I do appreciate it.