Wow thanks a lot for that!
Wow thanks a lot for that!
The screenshot had has the criteria included though. Relevant part: either be for children or for everyone.
The systematic change you describe would make sure that people are “on time” though, just redefining on what that meaning.
Being “on time” I understand as one of two things:
The first one is your responsibility, the latter is impossible to make in a way that works for everyone.
I don’t understand how this “change” should look like, what you’d expect people to do for meeting each other and events.
Of course I’m fine with “I take public transport I’ll be there between four and six” as a statement for punctuality. Beyond that though?
And France has a shitload of jobs!
I bet that even your ass is still on your backside so three of three wrong.
The first link goes into amazing detail on that. In short: all your information concerning location as well as current IP and some other metadata gets send to a basically unknown company with no transparency on how that data is handled.
I highly recommend reading the first, linked post though!
Yeah I had a brainfart, meant namespace…
And thanks a lot for this writeup I think with your help I figured out where I went wrong in my train of thought and I’ll give it another try next week when I have a bit downtime.
The time you took to write this is highly appreciated! ♥
Do you have a link at hand on how start a process within a specific veth by chance? Own name spaces are easy enough and a lot of tutorials but I don’t want my programs to ever be not in the vpn space, not at startup not as fail over etc.
That’s the reason why I stuck with the container setup, only for gluetun plus vpned services.
Nah, too focused and not enough repetition and generalizations ;)
Main reason for answering: thanks!
Cups
linux printing server - if you want to share a printer over network or just use one locally on a linux machine.
(not OP but same boat) Doesn’t really matter to me because google knows my servers external IP which is a non-issue: I don’t expect google to try to attack me individually but crawl data about me. There is no automatic link between my server and my personal browsing habits.
In terms of attack vector vs ease of use , self hosting searxng is a nobrainer for me - but I do have an external server available for things like that anyway so no additional overhead needed.
Thanks for the clarification! A wish you an awesome start into the week :)
Preventing teenage pregnancy by obfuscating sex has the same idea.
I agree with the boundaries part. The second part though: they will figure it out either way… At least my brother did when he was young and our parentsgot a nice lawyer in voice for that (fucked up laws, I know, I know).
Personally I want them to learn about ransomware! If that cost me a PC… My fault.
Especially because the thread was dead your answer is highly appreciated!
A Dockerfile itself is the instruction set. There is a certain minimum requirement expected from a server admin that differs from end-user requirements.
The ease of docker obfuscates that quite a bit but if you want to go full bare metal (or full AWS or GCS, etc etc) then you need to manage the full admin part as well - including custom deployments.
No worries I phrased that quite weird I think.
A NAS is only more power efficient if the additional power of a full server is not used. If for some reason the server is still needed than the NAS will be additional power consumption and not save anything.
(for example I run some quite RAM and compute heavy things on my server which no stock NAS could handle I think).
That would replace the computer with the NAS though and is not true for a server that you’d want to extend, right?
Is that 370watt across all of them or per fat server? I ask because three m5 sound like a lot of power drain!.
And thanks for sharing!
I didn’t know that about the immich app, thanks for pointing it out!
Then you need a third application (e.g. syncthing) to replicate the auto upload functionality of Nextcloud.
Personally I don’t want to have same functionality in a different stack because of pipeline issues. Doesn’t solve OPs issue I just wanted to point out that your solution might have drawbacks OP didn’t see at first glance :)
Im not familiar with British law, anyone care to explain why this is capped at 90%? Kinda unintuitive to me.