The author pointed out how exceptions are often faster than checking every value. If your functions throws an error often enough that Exception handling noticeably slow down your program, surely you got to take a second look at what you’re doing.
They both have their place. I just recently discovered a bug in lemmy bot I wrote where the lemmy API module will raise an Exception if login fails (response status code != 200), which feels extremely out of place, as the error/status code do matter in that case.
Other times exceptions make more sense as Phillip pointed out.
It’s easier faster to ask for forgiveness than permission after all.
There was/is a few communities that are just bots mirroring a similar community on reddit. No idea if those got canned though.
- The format works for both lossy and lossless compression, depending on the use case and need. Photographs can be encoded in a lossy way much more efficiently than JPEG and things like screenshots can be losslessly encoded more efficiently than PNG.
Someone made a fair point that having a format being both lossy and lossless is not necessarily a great idea. If you download a jpeg file you know it will be compressed, if you download png it will be lossless. Shifting through jxl files to check if it’s lossy or not doesn’t sound very fun.
All in all I’m a big supporter of jxl though, it’s one of the only github repos I actively follow.
This exaggeration gets tiresome, there are some great uses for LLM. The copilot autocomplete got to be one of the greatest QoL functions in a modern IDE.
It also generally work great for tech support, and lowers the skill requirement for installing and maintaining a Linux distro. Nowadays I will usually just redirect tech support questions from family members to an LLM.
Just because it won’t solve cancer in 10 years like the tech bros preach doesn’t mean the tech is without uses.
Try changing to desktop mode, worked for me.
3, about two lines per contributor
It’s quite typical when you’re just starting out and do more work than you’re body is used to. It should get better time, the worst thing to do would be to stop moving.
Take it light(er), but keep training and your body will adapt to the workload. There is really no need to start at 100% when starting to workout after a long period of not training, ease into it.
Warm up/down will have no effect on the DOMS though, and eating healthy and sleeping well will only make your DOMS worse as your body’s immune system will have a stronger response to your muscle disruption (which is a good thing).
A single study with sample size of 8 can hardly be called a science answer.
According to A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery the results across are sometimes contradictory, with no agreed upon mechanical reason for why it should work and heavily tied to the psychological aspect of it.
It can be effective placebo treatment if you believe in it, but won’t actually treat the DOMS.
The only two people arguing against the change were both authors/contributors of is-number lol
No, not really. Women generally respond better to volume while men on average may benefit more from slightly lower volume, but steeper weight progression.
As for the BLL butt concern, you need to take into account that women have a different hip structure and generally higher body fat percentage that are also stored differently, which results in a different shape. It’s not something you should be concerned about.
Can’t say I have the same experience. Other than for old niche content, the sources cited from asking perplexity.ai (I just use it since it’s free, no idea how it compares to others) tend to be exactly what I’m after.
Surprised it wasn’t woodworking
The amount of copilots are getting out hand, are people able to keep track of all of them?
The copilot autocomplete and copilot chat are great QoL tools, but trying to have it generate complete PR for a given issue seems… optimistic.
I’m surprised Matthew concludes that it might actually be useful for some people honestly.
For general fitness wrist curls will be a waste of time as it doesn’t really transfer to anything in the real world, nor will you get much hypertrophy from the low volume. If you want something for your forearms, farmers walk will be a lot more useful as it trains your grip in a way that transfer nearly 1 to 1 with normal life activities.
Likewise, calf raises isn’t needed, walking should be plenty of stimulus for your calf if you aren’t aiming for hypertrophy.
The biggest issue with the program though is that it is completely missing what’s maybe your most important group of muscles, your back. You’ll want an exercise or two that trains your pulling muscles (other than the biceps). Deadlifts are great (and healthy) if you have a bar available. Dumbbell/barbell rows are great exercises, pull ups too if you got the strength. If pull ups are too difficult at the moment, you could try training only the eccentric portion of it until you get better at it.
It’s not terrible, but as the platform is focused on accessibility we should keep in mind not everyone got 20/20 vision and may rely on screen readers or similar aid. Some people may also not be used to reading cursive so it’s an extra obstacle for people wanting to help.
What’s your goal with the exercise plan? If it’s just for general fitness, wrist curls and calf raises will mostly be a waste of time.
If it’s for bodybuilding/aesthetics, the volume is way too low. Forearms and calves can easily be trained 3-4 times a week.
You should probably edit your post to include your program in text format rather than on just an image.
Your program is also missing sets and reps for each exercise.
The sea should be marked as C considering that’s what you’ll discover when you get deep into it.