This is a whataboutist counterpoint at best. Universities and their researchers are not a monolith.
This is a whataboutist counterpoint at best. Universities and their researchers are not a monolith.
I suppose I’ll be watching two pile of snakes pretending to be people for the duration of which this plays out.
In my case I was ecosystem’d into RPM and Flatpak, so openSUSE makes me happy
That’s a very interesting anecdote, now that you say it
I feel like a lot of people are missing the point when it comes to the MIST. I just very briefly skimmed the paper.
Misinformation susceptibility is being vulnerable to information that is incorrect
It’s funny how the post about a misinformation test was riddled with misinformation because no one bothered to read the paper before letting their mouth run. Now, I don’t doubt that your brilliant minds can overrule a measure produced with years of research and hundreds of participants off the top of your head, but even if what I’ve said may be contradicted with a deeper analysis of the paper, shouldn’t it be the baseline?
Then just write proprietary code. Open source philosophy to me seems about creation for a “greater good”. What’s the point if you’re not even going to be open? The organisation just becomes a massive corporation like any other at that point.
That depends on whether the communication channel is encrypted.
A world without advertising and marketing is a world without persuasion. These two concepts by themselves were never the problem, as they’re just a means to increase awareness and demand for a product or service. To me it seems that you instead take issue with a consumerist society.
I read the headline and my immediate thought was “is this controlled for socioeconomic class?”
I guess I’m reading the paper