So don’t?
So don’t?
“Finally”? Barf.
It’s very human, that’s why it happens everywhere in history and also in at least like 4 or 5 different places right now.
We’d like to think we’re nice and rational and empathetic, but we’re just not as a species.
Because what is legal and not does not involve all that much logic.
Today, in a truly shocking twist, it turns out on Lemmy that landlords are actually bad! Who’d’a fucking thunk it after only about 4.7 quintillion times.
Not uplifting, though.
Damn Brunhild, that’s just like her.
That makes sense. For some reason, I thought it was something like “no reason to do what I did”. So basically “Sure, totally no ulterior motives here, by the way!”, which seemed kinda weird to me.
“Ah, {countryName} switched out their authoritarian ruler for someone who thought FNV’s Caesar’s Legion were a pretty cool bunch.”
Do you happen to know why it’s “keine Ursache”? That is a thing in Danish and Norwegian too (“ingen årsak”) and I always thought it was a weird phrase.
“De nada”? Which is really confusing as that is Spanish and “Danke” is from German.
But your point was that this is actively keeping people on Discord? By extension, that must mean that a significant bulk of those 150M users are kept on Discord because it has PluralKit. How do you reconcile that with the group of plurals being, apparently, quite small? To the point where even on Beehaw/Lemmy almost nobody seems to even have heard of it.
Interesting argument. I’d be curious if you know roughly how many plural people there are (let’s say headcounts as there’s only one body) compared to Discord’s user base. (150 million active users per month according to random half-assed google search)
Because if you don’t keep a close eye on mental patients, some of them might hurt or kill themselves or other people - sometimes in extraordinarily resourceful and unexpected ways. It’s rare and overhyped, but the fact that it does happen means the system needs to account for it. Then add the usual amount of greed, incompetence, stigma etc., and suddenly the only way of accounting for that is, well, prison style.
Sure, that’s fine. I use interactive rebase for “cleaning” a lot. I’m just saying it doesn’t make a difference for diffing (as you can diff any commit against any other) and doing it as a matter of routine sounds like it could skip potentially useful history.
I mostly rebase but if a branch has things happen in a sequence that matters, I would merge it instead, for example.
Sort of. What passes for “debate” often isn’t as controlled as it ought to be and people don’t necessarily know how it should be done - “what do you mean, ‘yeah well, your mother’ isn’t a valid argument?!”.
When it’s clearly bad faith, there’s no way to get any value out of that situation, so I’d be edging slowly towards the door.
Squashing seems like you’d potentially lose out on info and have a harder time isolating the changes you’re looking through. I guess it depends on how much has been changed and whether some of the commits along the branch were more important than others.
I also don’t think the reset is necessary, you should be able to diff the branch head against whatever you want.
Give some JS dev about fifteen minutes
To be fair, back in the day you could get better results by relying on Google with
site:foobar
and the Boolean/“power user” stuff. A lot of built-in search boxes on sites were a bit dodgy, or at least less flexible than AND/OR/NOT and other “power user tricks”.Of course, these days those seem to be ignored wholesale and even “verbatim quotes” are an utter crapshoot, this was back when Google didn’t fucking blow.