Yeah if where’s the thrill if you’re just gonna be notified of nukes & nados like a wuss

Also personally, prefer a 0.00% chance of finding a wandering elderly person or abducted kid to 0.00001%

(If either feature were frequently abused that would change my calculus, or maybe if I had severe anxiety(?) or a critical sleep schedule or something)

Edit: I mean this more lightheartedly than it sounds

Good catch.

Also psh, there’s no verb, suggesting the password should be exactly one special character and nothing else.

I’ve trusted the Otterbox Defender for 15 years.

I wish someone did like 100-drop drop tests with a dozen different cases. If it could be proven I could trust a thinner case just as much as:

I’d go for it. Yes, YouTubers will drop a phone a couple times, but that could be a case test or a luck test.

I really like Lemmy

Hello world, hallelujah, hallelujah

Well said

(not saying you are middle class or in a first world country, but given you are on lemmy and know what the nitrogen cycle is, it’s statistically likely).

And even cracking smiles with that :)

Hey that’s Fred Rogers you’re talking about here!

:(

I was surprised Hamas allowed it after the fake CIA vaccination thing with Osama.

Uneducated here, how?

Not fair, I’m off shift right now.

On an unrelated note, let me take a video of you saying you’re going to kill the president.

Anyway I thought fed strategy was very legal totally-not-entrapment stuff on 4chan but I suppose reddit’s big enough they should be there too. Hopefully for CSAM & foreign bot research, not sex work & steroids.

Are there any notable or recent examples of fed posts?

Two humans in this story helped! Most people are good.

Indeed. For reference, compare how many people have cut in front of you in line in person versus in a vehicle.

swag hat

-parent commenter

These guys?

Guide (SDF Wiki)

Register (sdf.org)

Thanks for fighting for accuracy, desperately needed in the modern era.

Can you make a change today so that The Guardian & Breitbart would never appear to be similarly [un]credible at first glance?

If not, a small pause could make sense. Better than damaging credibility not much of established news agencies perhaps but certainly the bot, limiting its impact in the future even if the problem’s corrected (think insta-downvotes from older users once burned by it). Folks respect pauses for refactoring!

Maybe MBFC isn’t tops and there’s some attractive alternative btw!

PS: thanks @Five@slrpnk.net for the alarm

Pro-independence Kanak parties use the name (la) Kanaky

TIL

I’d throw thems in the mahn

The first story eh

Seems you’d want to understand # of errors/omissions/mistruths as a proportion of total news stories, and the impact of and reason for those issues.

Get a sense Guardian is quite trustworthy but it would require a much more extensive look than the fact checker appears to have taken (and obviously than I’ve taken). Thanks for recommending caution here.