I’m working on open source projects :)
🔗 Links:
GitHub |
---|
🍪 Get me a cookie:
Go to Ko-fi | GitHub Sponsor |
---|
That’s a problem everywhere, but I’ve found that people are a lot better on here about downvotes?
On Reddit I’d see comments and questions with no replies and only downvotes. Here you’re a lot more likely to see responses
This is very helpful, thank you! I’ll look into setting up more of that sometime
Good to know, I’ll explore some more
Thank you!
Makes sense, thank you!
Sounds good! This was my first dive into browser extensions as well. It’s not too bad once you go over the basics. If you give it a try, see the contributing page on the repo’s wiki for some resources on how to get started with browser extensions.
A super short summary is:
If you DO give it a try, we were part way through migrating features from the LemmyTools userscript and that might be a good place to start. I wasn’t familiar with userscripts so I didn’t make much progress, and can’t get back to it for a little while. The issues page of the repo should have LemmyTools related features tagged. If any details are missing, let me know and I’ll add them in :)
We’re actually working on a browser extension for this! It currently supports both communities and posts
We ran into the same issue, federated sites are hard to work with. Right now, the extension has it so that a user needs to right click on a link to be redirected. That way the user can choose which links get redirected, and there’s no chance of accidentally redirecting the wrong thing.
There are other solutions (using the API for example), but they seemed to slow the browser down too much. Another proposed feature that hasn’t been implemented yet was to redirect when holding down a key (when holding down “r”, try to redirect the link).
Feel free to take a look, try it, and you can totally contribute code. It’s all open source and we’ve tried to keep the code simple and easy to verify/contribute.
This is a bit of a tangent, but I’m curious who runs this website: http://www.edwaittimes.ca/WaitTimes.aspx
It’s always been slow for me, and it doesn’t feel that accessible (text is hard to read etc.). A quick upgrade and refresh might make it a lot smoother for people. If we wanted to go more fancy with it, it could have a dashboard page just for hospitals to display in their ERs, like they do (did?) at MSJ.
I know BC has a Github with open source projects, and this seems like a relatively simple upgrade if we knew what the API / data source was. I’m noticing some AJAX & jquery. Could something like Vue/Nuxt work as a replacement? The pages could be rendered server side, and then every 5 minutes it could be refreshed with the new data.
I don’t have as much experience working with the stack, but from what I’ve read it seems like Rust is a pretty solid choice for the backend. It also seems like a lot of the upgrades people want are for the front end, so that’s what would benefit the most from being simpler.
Typescript makes sense, and a handful of frameworks have typescript support. Would anyone know more about the benefits of using Inferno over something like Vue/Nuxt or plain React?
That sounds good, and it sounds easy enough to implement.
I’ve made the issue here: https://github.com/cynber/lemmy-instance-assistant/issues/45
I’ll get to it when I have time in the next few months, unless someone else gets to it first :)
There are a few userscripts out there which I could integrate into the extension. It depends on when this commit gets pushed into Lemmy core:
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2397
After that, it could still be useful if someone wanted to block it browser wide. At that point I’d check if people still want something like that.
Sorry to those that have already seen this. I’m trying to space out the posts so it’s not in a large clump in your feeds. People have different subscription lists, so I’m trying to reach those that haven’t seen it yet.
These are the last 4 posts :)
I guess so, it would still be a problem. Once one extension is caught, it should be simpler to catch the rest.
It’s harder to quickly switch stuff up when you need to send the devs new code to put in
Don’t extensions get reviewed by the various stores? I’d imagine an automated check could catch malicious integrations like that.
Maybe not right away, but once they catch wind of one shady extension they could just search the store for any other ones.
I was chatting with a friend, and she mentioned how she tries to at least set up a README, which includes her vision for the project and her plan for the implementation, design, and goals.
Best case scenario is that the planning helps her complete the project herself. Worst case scenario, someone else can pick up where she left off and use her considerations for the project.
I’m thinking of doing that for future projects too