Which is better in what way exactly?
Which is better in what way exactly?
You mean does the 80s-based protocol that doesn’t even support encryption support voice?
It doesn’t support having messages received while you were offline
IRC supports one and one thing only: N-wise chats to connected clients. That and delusional nerds who like to think they’re better than everyone else. Huge support for that too.
People who actually have sane standards for their instant messaging use the Matrix decentralized chat protocol when they need non-proprietary coms, or revolt
When people say this it should be mentioned that shorts really don’t pay much
I guess printf “” > file
I don’t care about the porn. Any Geoguessr player who’d know where this is?
Is it guanzhou, China?
They fail on their promise of curbing the mods problem with a transparent modlog and active admins. It’s the same bunch of authoritarian kids as reddit and the power dynamics are unchanged, they make friends with each other and with the administrators and it’s exactly as hard to get one removed as it ever was on major lemmy instances
I prefer the federation where if a mod/admin’s bad you can just create a community with the same name on a different instance
Null pointers, runtime exceptions and try catch blocks in 2023
Was this written by saudi arabia?
This is something you can google. It’s been talked about to death. Even in the worst energy mix countries EVs still beats gas on emissions during the cars lifetime
It works but you do it twice when you could do it once
But I expect anyone who’s programmed some pathfinding before to, at the minimum, be able to say “run A* twice”. Somehow AIs never understand the prompt well enough
I think the best option is to make sure to have ‘sorted’ the calls to the fire tiles, you can do that by having them in a separate grid or just stash them to a small local array on stack when you encounter them, and investigate those at the end of the loop
If there’s no result that’s been found under the cost limit without the fire at each point of the algorithm, you do do the recursive calls for the fire as well, and you flag your result as “has fire in it” for the caller on top
When getting a result from your several recursive calls, you take the best non-fire result that’s under 15 tiles long, else you take the best result period
Then once you’re back to the top level call, if there was a non-fire path you will get that result, if there wasn’t you will get that instead
I’ve had 100% failure rate on simple requirements that require a simple spin on well known solutions
“Make a pathfinding function for a 2d grid” - fine
“Make a pathfinding function for a 2d grid, but we can only move 15 cells at a time” - fails on lesser models, it keeps clinging to pulling you the same A* as the first one
“Make a pathfinding function for a 2d grid, but we can only move 15 cells at a time, also, some cells are on fire and must be avoided if possible, but if there is no other path possible then you’re allowed to use fire cells as fallback” - Never works
There for that last one, none of the models give a solution that fits the very simple requirement. It will either always avoid fire or give fire a higher cost, which is not at all a fitting solution
High costs means if you’ve got a path that’s 15 tiles long without fire, but way shorter with fire, then sure, some fire is fine! And if you could walk 15 tiles and go to your destination but need to walk on 1 fire, then it will count that as 15-something and that’s too long.
Except no, that’s not what you asked.
If you try and tell it that, gpt4 flip flops between avoiding fire and touching the price of tiles
It fails because all the literature on pathfinding talks about is the default approach, and cost heuristic functions. That won’t cut it here, you have to touch the meat of the algorithm and no one ever covers that (because that’s just programming, it depends on what you need to do there are infinite ways you could do it, to fit infinite business requirements)
Having seen original source code hasn’t been an issue in previous cases where the reimplementation was done in another language with the changes one would expect coding up something a second time, I believe
Moore’s law 2: thermal boogaloo
Do you know what is theoretically limiting it to 40-45% in the physical process we are using?
What
There’s already EnoughMuskSpam fully dedicated to musk antics, I feel like this place could benefit from closing off Bozo so the community can develop different posting habits
Semi related but I can barely imagine one single 70+ years old politician who’d have listened to urbanists and climate activists on that one. I doubt anyone could think of 2 in five minutes
As soon as you reach decrepitness brain just goes vroom vroom suburbs
Half of the unique visitors maybe, the traffic of the people on Google visit 1 post. The people with an account who browse it at work see 500
i am devastated
It ““worked”” in France
It still kills most of the userbase when they do it
Normal people don’t know what a fucking dns is
You end up with 10 more new sites and a drop in quality and an endless game of cat & mouse