Because they just have their own brain chemistry as the basis of it whereas the above comment clearly states:

Rust has proven empirically that the tradeoff between performance and safety doesn’t need to exist.

Which is truth. And it’s much easier to base a coherent argument on truth rather than vibes.

I mean, if you treat your inbox as a to-do list, that’s not that far-fetched

Wow you’re insane. “I know, I’ll discredit the woman who just pointed out that it’s hard to get credit in her field as a woman ”

Did you get lost?

Great point, but this part of the quote is still dumb as rocks:

Coding is just kind of like the language that we talk to computers. It’s not necessarily the skill in and of itself. The skill in and of itself is like, how do I innovate? How do I go build something that’s interesting for my end users to use?

Sure, if you have a big workforce hand-coding UI, you might replace some of them by better tools. But things like that are a fraction of a fraction of the responsibilities developers have

Yeah, the motivation here is “please panic-buy our GPUs/please panic-buy into our cloud GPU infrastructure ”

Again: not what the person said. They said that if someone proves that you host CSAM, you should take it down.

No, that’s not what the person is saying in the slightest. Just read their comment again, it’s actually very clear.

No. You can say that about so many laws being made, but telegram simply hosts the most vile shit.

Not just all cultures, all eras as well. From Mesopotamian stone slates over medieval hogshide, paper to the internet: boomers gonna complain

dbg!() for Rust users

He works on Linux where he controls the whole stack down to the metal and I love that for him, but other people have to call library code, and them debug that if it doesn’t work as they thought it would.

Try spending a new year’s eve in e.g. Germany.

everybody above the age of 15 can and will start fireworks in close vicinity to everyone else doing it. You do not feel safe.

You’re right, of you have compete freedom, do that. If the place you want or need to go to is most comfortably reachable via rattlesnake road, bring boots.

In other words, if you don’t think the wasm landscape is mature enough to build a web thing with it, you are stuck with JavaScript, but you don’t have to rawdog it. I haven’t run in a single weird thing like this in years of writing typescript with the help of its type system, ESLint and a formatter.

[citation needed]

Just use a formatter. It’ll show you that the second one is two statements:

1. {} (the empty block)
2. +[] coerce an empty array to a number: new Number(new Array())

I haven’t read anything this cursed in a while

I usually write “POSIXy shell” but I thought that was clear from context this time.

The problem is that exit statuses !=0 aren’t treated as error by default (with a way to turn that off for individual expressions). Instead you have to set multiple settings and avoid certain constructs in bash/ZSH/…

Everything that works like a modern programming language by default is fine of course

Yeah, and that’s just one of many many things to consider.

As a long time former ZSH user, I’ll definitely include ZSH in shell languages to avoid for scripting.

The problem is simply the number of rules and incantations to slavishly include everywhere to make your script bail on error. set -e is not enough by far.

Python with plumbum or nushell are definitely better.