I’m new here and don’t know what to put in my profile. She/them, living in Aotearoa/New Zealand.

  • 1 Post
  • 139 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle














  • Thanks so much, I understand the hypothesis now!!

    And that article does show how it could map onto humans. For some reason I had been under the impression that early hominids did not necessarily have the females-as-strangers setup.

    It’s interesting to compare with elephants, who are matriarchal. The “Alice” of an asian elephant herd will often stop having kids (though, she biologically still can) so her daughters can have some, even though unlike Charlotte, her daughters are related to her so theoreticly it’s more of a Bob/Daniel situation.


  • I feel like the stupidest person in the world because I still don’t see the difference between Bob and Alice and now I also don’t understand this part

    If Daniel has a child, Bob won’t have a new child, to avoid starving his grandchild.

    How does Bob do this? Why doesn’t he just menopause too? If menopause ensures more descendant survival wouldn’t they both do it?

    Why doesn’t Alice just die?

    The troupe still have to find enough food for her, how is that an evolutionary advantage to keep a non breeding member around?

    If something happens to Charlotte now the troupe cannot reproduce unless they go out and find a new female, but if something happens to Daniel then Bob can still reproduce with Charlotte. What is the advantage in that asymetry?

    Edit: I was puzzling over the Charlotte factor. Is it more that somewhere along the line the Charlottes of this world were killing the non-menopausal Alices? Because that kind of would make sense.

    Thank you so much for taking the time to try to explain it by the way. If you don’t feel like answering my latest round of questions that’s okay!