I had some scammers from “Bell” that said they were giving me a free phone as a reward for being a loyal customer. The problem? I haven’t subscribed to Bell in over a decade.
I strung them along for a while and figured out they were probably trying to get my 2FA code so they could hijack my account and presumably order new devices on my credit.
Yet another case where under-funding the LTB is bad for both landlords and tenants, and yet, the backlog continues…
Yeah, he reimplemented it in Java to get garbage collection. The Alzheimer’s is cured but he takes ten minutes to pour a glass of water.
Whoops, stopped the lungs process instead of the cardiac arrest process.
Actually you really want to restart the heart service, right? sudo systemd restart heart
All guns seized from this blockade were also being used to disrupt international trade.
Subcom: noum (informal) a submissive comedy
Is that why there’s a fence around it now?
Is the “IP routing traffic” referring to, ARP or BGP or which other protocol?
Do you realize that 67% does not refer to the tax rate, but rather the amount of capital gains that are taxed as income? Meaning that the remaining 33% are always completely tax free?
Example: you sell an investment property for $2,000,000 which you had previously bought for $1,000,000. Your annual salary is $75,000.
In this example, of the $1,000,000 capital gain, 50% of the first $250,000 ($125k) is taxable and 67% of the remaining $750,000 ($500k) is taxable. So, add $625k to your salaried income of $75k and your total taxable income is $700,000.
The total income tax you would pay after the proposed increase (assuming you live in Ontario) is $342,103, which is $320,405 more than you would have normally paid on your salary of $75,000. Therefore, your effective tax rate on the $1M capital gain is roughly 32%, not the 60% you mentioned in your comment.
This is partly why I prefer Firefox’s implementation of the find feature - it allows case-sensitive search while Chrome does not support it.
Surely the word ‘in’ would appear countless times out of context on the table of contents.
It really seems to me that municipalities simply don’t have the resources to support housing. Housing is a national problem and leaving it up to municipalities only creates perverse incentives to drive people experiencing homelessness out of your community into another, which isn’t doing anything to solve the underlying problem. We need a national housing first program, but this story demonstrates the importance of getting it right.
Governments should also be building public housing, like yesterday. People scapegoat landlords a lot but they are also subject to the laws of supply and demand. The only two levers the government has are to decrease demand (e.g. cracking down on short term rentals, stunting our economy by limiting population growth) and increasing supply (e.g. zoning in the missing middle, building affordable public housing).
Classic case of hating the game and not the player.
TD seemed happy to throw him under the bus, though.
As outrage grew, the same user posted a photo of an apparent reply from TD. “Thank you for bringing the video to our attention,” it said. “The alleged actions and messages captured in the video do not align with our TD values and culture of care. I can confirm that the individual named in the video no longer works at TD.”
This is unsurprising. The ODSP shelter portion is about $672/month for a single person. It’s very difficult to find shelter for that amount in most places in Ontario, for one.
non-investor landlords
Isn’t that an oxymoron? A landlord is by definition, an investor. Maybe you mean something else…
Right, but you can also rent affordable housing…
Are you suggesting that building affordable homes wouldn’t help anyone escape homelessness?
Landlords already can and do check the credit of tenants. The new change is only that paying rent affects your credit.
I get honked at, cut off, yelled at and/or threatened about once per week.