You’re hilarious. Nice try.
You’re hilarious. Nice try.
You still talking about the comment that I didn’t write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool.
I wholeheartedly agree.
Funny how that works isn’t it
You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it.
Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you’re so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term.
Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down.
Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore.
Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive.
Exactly. Thats the problem.
Global consumption and production are increasing
Do. You. Follow?
Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew?
Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser.
Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn’t mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I’m having trouble finding your quote.
Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water.
everything i’ve said is true
It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed.
Are u moving goal posts to feel like you’re winning something or genuinely expect the comment section in an online forum to solve societal issues?
Less meat produced = better.
How much more better things could be a different wat is irrelevant; using that as an excuse to never do anything is actually damaging.
Cuz youre lying about a very emotionally charged topic and calling me a liar. If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data.
Wheree do you get your numbers from?
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254608/soy-production-end-uses-worldwide/
They seem off my guy.
Weird to not provide real numbers for someone calling me a liar
Are u saying if over night the entire customer base of meat as a whole stopped buying it would have zero effect? Certainly thats not whay youre saying right?
I mean if they make substantially less money with product x they scale back production. Just like with any other product.
Really not that complicated. Obviously they’re not tracking my personal consumption, nobody believes that.
It does, if enough people did it.
You’re so angry lol
Besides the topicals OTC that i outlined in here, US friends of mine “keep” their remaining prescription ABs for when they are sick again.
Like he got prescribed some for a COLD and then kept them to pop when he gets the next COLD :'D
Its nuts. Some OTC, others simply overprescribed.
Here you get a prescription if you have a severe infection, OR a substantial injury with high risk.
Thats why i didnt write what you claim i did.
“they have over the counter antiobiotics”
As in antibiotics exist there that are OTC.
Is that so absurd?
exactly, because almost 100% of that soy is for meat production
I think that’s a good thing, especially concerning domestic flights.