True

then it wont be linux, but a shittily maintained private copy that will fall out of disuse quickly unless they merge all upstream changes without too much oversight (in which case, why bother?) to keep feature parity

True

This joke hasn’t aged well. I took it as is and just assumed the Dad put together a micro PC with a PS2 emulator on it, and then I stared at the article for 5 minutes looking for the punchline.

At first I thought you meant it’d be a bad fork, but then I realise you meant it’d be a bad fork.

As long as it’s open source and vetted by the public, I don’t see how it could go bad tbh

Yeah but cars have become increasingly more complex over the last 20 years. You basically need an EEPROM arduino kit these days just to get the fucking diagnostics out of the car, because someone decided that analog circuits were just too much bulk

no, but they pretend otherwise, so them publicly salivating for it is a new level of embarrassing.

I keep mine only attached to ad-hoc networks with no outside signal, but there’s literally no saying whether it has its own modem

Given the measurable power output, I’d think not, but who’s to say what it does when connected to stable power node after X hours.

ESP32

I love this chip :'-(
say it ain’t so

wait what game has water effects with water reflections?

Does Russian have stricter grammar syntax than German? I was a bit puzzled by the comparison made above

Lisp (specifically IPL) is Proto-Indo-European. All languages have unwittingly taken inspiration from it

is this something I need to do every single update?

Keep up the good and important work guys, we’re rooting for you.

They would never do that, that would be dangerous. But at red lights, or when you first start the motor, or at the gas station? Oh you betcha betcha betcha

Good point. Harder to parse would be my guess

Thanks for this. Still, I would be curious to see this for a 4K level image. Also I wonder if your screenshot tool did a bitmap copy of the screen or intrinsically converted it to PNG first before pasting it into your paint editor.

But that’s patently untrue: take this 10 MB example TIFF file as an example.

• PNG Compression, max compress (=quality 9):

  convert file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff -quality 9 test.png
  

• JPG Encoding, 99% quality (=quality 99):

  convert file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff -quality 99 test.jpg
  

Final file size comparison:

9.7M Sep  5 13:21 file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff
1.7M Sep  5 13:22 test.jpg
2.5M Sep  5 13:22 test.png

PNG is significantly larger, and difference in quality between them is negligible

why though? The graphics represented in the screen are already squashed and scaled, so you wouldn’t be preserving their quality in any case. If you’re worried about text, JPEG should still be able to handle it under high quality settings

PNG started out as ZIP(BMP) and hasn’t gotten that much better. Use JPEG. The pixels you lose are not worth crying about