SO has mechanisms in place to filter out AI-generated content.
Editing any content to reduce its quality is considered vandalism and gets reverted on SO.
By realising that what we now call waste will be the fuel source of the future. And also understanding that the renewables require a lot more area, material and energy to build than nuclear: https://robertbryce.substack.com/p/the-iron-law-of-power-density-part
If you feel your comment did not adequately convey your intentions, you can always clarify the intended meaning.
Please name some instances when a trans person or woman has thrown a violent tantrum and ended up killing more than ten people. These issues are far from being equal or even comparable.
My thoughts exactly. People keep saying “but what if it happened to you?” But hey, if police is pointing a gun at me I’m sure as hell listening very attentively and doing exactly and only what they say as if my life depended on it. So I’m pretty sure it won’t happen to me. ¯\(ツ)/¯
Ah, I think I got the source of misunderstanding: these mechanisms are not automated, but implemented as moderation guidelines and rules.