• Fuckass [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lol, I highly doubt china will be desperate enough to use consumer level drones and scopes to take over Taiwan given how many soldiers they have with real military equipment.

      But even if they are desperate, what makes you think they won’t just seize the factories and pump out 20x the number being shipped to Russia and Ukraine, and the rest of the world? Not to mention, I don’t think China is dumb enough to go to war while Russia is busy at a completely different war, so I really don’t think a couple thousand shitty drones will make a difference 5-10 years from now

      • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Russia’s military strength has been degrading since the war began. How long do you wait with your ally losing strength? Sure, you could prop him up but then that’s a drain on your economy. If you postpone indefinitely, the situation may change to be even more unfavorable.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Generally speaking, China benefits from stalling for as long as possible. The power of the imperial core is waning, so if China can navigate things such that the US – due to its own economic dependency on imperialism – crumbles to a much lower stature without the US launching nukes, then its influence in the world will become a shadow of what it was and reunification without firing a shot may be viable.

          • culpritus [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            without the US launching nukes

            I was just talking about this today. China is leading towards a multi-polar world very effectively, but the US is the only nation to have used nukes in history. Really puts things in stark relief.

            • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Plus the leadership in DC are senile psychopaths who have at best a loose grasp on world affairs. And that’s just the Democrats. The GOP are increasingly all fascists completely divorced from reality. Real “Sick old man” hours, except unlike the Ottomans DC has enough nukes to flash-fry the planet if the wrong corpse-lich has a stroke at the right time.

        • Fuckass [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          China has waited centuries to get Hong Kong back and decades for Taiwan. What’s another 10 years? Why would they do some reckless shit like invasion when they’re still in the process of courting neighbors? All the superpowers are observing this war right now to see each other’s abilities, and the war hasn’t been finished yet. There’s no material benefit to invading anyone right now

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure that makes it any better. Oppressing a country vs. helping oppress a country.

      • IllNess@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Politically it’s better. Ukraine has 16 countries that committed over a billion Euros. We’re not how many countries would back Taiwan.

        • Rayleigh@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean over a billion Euros is technically correct, the actual number however is more like 150 to 200 billion Euros

          • mihor@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of our hard-earned money, those degenerate warmongers (I’m looking at you, Urszula)!

        • jcit878@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          the difference is in Taiwan’s case america would be directly involved and have already committed to this, it is likely Japan would also and some other countries are likely to contribute to. china wouldn’t have a hope

      • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It:s a shame because supplying that gear to Ukraine would have helped China’s reputation on the international stage and bolstered trade. It would have not been well received by the Kremlin but a losing army can’t invade anyone else.

    • zephyreks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh no! Not the DJI Mavic Pro! Whatever will they do without

      *4/3 CMOS Hasselblad Camera *Dual Tele Cameras *Cine Only Tri-Camera Apple ProRes Support

      • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Here’s hoping. How do you think they will solve their naval border disputes with neighboring countries?